> I hope you had information you wanted from Julia ?
Yes. - I am waiting on another Coccinelle software release which will
contain improvements for my feature requests and bug reports.
I'm curious when I should retry proposed filter patterns.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this
>> https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-March/000676.html
>> http://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors=139405971927100=2
> Regular expressions do not allow taking advantage of the optimizations
> provided by Coccinelle and are not easy for a reader to understand.
I find that the application of
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 23:00:22 +0200
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Sorry but I'm not working on coccinelle ; just did a small script for
> > kernel tree.
>
> I would appreciate a more constructive feedback for my update suggestions
> around
> the topic "Deletion of unnecessary checks before
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 23:00:22 +0200
SF Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Sorry but I'm not working on coccinelle ; just did a small script for
kernel tree.
I would appreciate a more constructive feedback for my update suggestions
around
the topic Deletion of
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-March/000676.html
http://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitorsm=139405971927100w=2
Regular expressions do not allow taking advantage of the optimizations
provided by Coccinelle and are not easy for a reader to understand.
I find that the application of
I hope you had information you wanted from Julia ?
Yes. - I am waiting on another Coccinelle software release which will
contain improvements for my feature requests and bug reports.
I'm curious when I should retry proposed filter patterns.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Sorry but I'm not working on coccinelle ; just did a small script for
> > kernel tree.
>
> I would appreciate a more constructive feedback for my update suggestions
> around
> the topic "Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function
> Sorry but I'm not working on coccinelle ; just did a small script for kernel
> tree.
I would appreciate a more constructive feedback for my update suggestions around
the topic "Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls".
- Did you look at the concrete patches?
- How do you
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> > V3:
> >-Update print_main message.
>
> Does the discussion topic need also an adjustment?
>
> How do you think about my previous update suggestion "Deletion of
> unnecessary checks before specific function calls"?
>
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:38:15 +0200
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> >> How do you think about my previous update suggestion "Deletion of
> >> unnecessary checks before specific function calls"?
> >> https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-March/000675.html
> >>
>> How do you think about my previous update suggestion "Deletion of
>> unnecessary checks before specific function calls"?
>> https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-March/000675.html
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/344
> I didn't see you made the same kind of script.
Will my
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:08:35 +0200
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> > V3:
> >-Update print_main message.
>
> Does the discussion topic need also an adjustment?
>
> How do you think about my previous update suggestion "Deletion of
> unnecessary checks before specific function calls"?
>
> V3:
>-Update print_main message.
Does the discussion topic need also an adjustment?
How do you think about my previous update suggestion "Deletion of
unnecessary checks before specific function calls"?
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-March/000675.html
V3:
-Update print_main message.
Does the discussion topic need also an adjustment?
How do you think about my previous update suggestion Deletion of
unnecessary checks before specific function calls?
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-March/000675.html
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:08:35 +0200
SF Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
V3:
-Update print_main message.
Does the discussion topic need also an adjustment?
How do you think about my previous update suggestion Deletion of
unnecessary checks before specific
How do you think about my previous update suggestion Deletion of
unnecessary checks before specific function calls?
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-March/000675.html
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/344
I didn't see you made the same kind of script.
Will my approach become a
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:38:15 +0200
SF Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
How do you think about my previous update suggestion Deletion of
unnecessary checks before specific function calls?
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-March/000675.html
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
V3:
-Update print_main message.
Does the discussion topic need also an adjustment?
How do you think about my previous update suggestion Deletion of
unnecessary checks before specific function calls?
Sorry but I'm not working on coccinelle ; just did a small script for kernel
tree.
I would appreciate a more constructive feedback for my update suggestions around
the topic Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls.
- Did you look at the concrete patches?
- How do you
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Sorry but I'm not working on coccinelle ; just did a small script for
kernel tree.
I would appreciate a more constructive feedback for my update suggestions
around
the topic Deletion of unnecessary checks before specific function calls.
-
20 matches
Mail list logo
