On 09/24/2014 03:20 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 17/09/14 15:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
of memory a
On 09/24/2014 03:20 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 17/09/14 15:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
Direct Xen to place the initial P-M table outside of the initial
mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
of memory a
On 09/24/2014 03:20 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 17/09/14 15:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
of memory a
On 17/09/14 15:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
> mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
> restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
> of memory a domain can be handed initially.
>
> As
On 17/09/14 15:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
Direct Xen to place the initial P-M table outside of the initial
mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
of memory a domain can be handed initially.
As the
On 09/24/2014 03:20 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 17/09/14 15:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
Direct Xen to place the initial P-M table outside of the initial
mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
of memory a
On 23/09/14 04:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 09/17/2014 04:59 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
>> mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
>> restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
>> of
On 23/09/14 04:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 09/17/2014 04:59 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
Direct Xen to place the initial P-M table outside of the initial
mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
of memory a
On 09/17/2014 04:59 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
of memory a domain can be handed initially.
As the
On 09/17/2014 04:59 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
Direct Xen to place the initial P-M table outside of the initial
mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
of memory a domain can be handed initially.
As the
Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
of memory a domain can be handed initially.
As the initial P->M table is copied rather early during
Direct Xen to place the initial P-M table outside of the initial
mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
of memory a domain can be handed initially.
As the initial P-M table is copied rather early during
12 matches
Mail list logo
