On 24/03/2021 17:46:19+0800, heying (H) wrote:
> Many thanks for your suggestion. As you suggest, rtc_lock should be local to
> platforms.
>
> Does it mean not only powerpc but also all other platforms should adapt this
> change?
Not all the other ones, in the current state, x86 still needs it. I
Dear Alexandre,
在 2021/3/24 17:29, Alexandre Belloni 写道:
On 24/03/2021 05:09:39-0400, He Ying wrote:
We found these warnings in arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c as follows:
warning: symbol 'decrementer_max' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it
Le 24/03/2021 à 10:29, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
On 24/03/2021 05:09:39-0400, He Ying wrote:
We found these warnings in arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c as follows:
warning: symbol 'decrementer_max' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it be s
Le 24/03/2021 à 10:09, He Ying a écrit :
We found these warnings in arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c as follows:
warning: symbol 'decrementer_max' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'dtl_consumer' was not declared.
On 24/03/2021 05:09:39-0400, He Ying wrote:
> We found these warnings in arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c as follows:
> warning: symbol 'decrementer_max' was not declared. Should it be static?
> warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
> warning: symbol 'dtl_consumer' was not dec
We found these warnings in arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c as follows:
warning: symbol 'decrementer_max' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'dtl_consumer' was not declared. Should it be static?
Declare 'decrementer_ma
6 matches
Mail list logo
