On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 4:13 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 26-06-20, 09:24, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > On Friday 26 Jun 2020 at 09:21:42 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > The locking around governors handling isn't adequate currently. The list
> > > of governors should never be traversed without
On Monday 29 Jun 2020 at 07:43:09 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I described why I chose to keep it that way in the other email, but I
> am all for dropping the variable. And so what about this ?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index
On 26-06-20, 09:24, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Friday 26 Jun 2020 at 09:21:42 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > The locking around governors handling isn't adequate currently. The list
> > of governors should never be traversed without locking in place. Also we
> > must make sure the governor isn't
On Friday 26 Jun 2020 at 09:21:42 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The locking around governors handling isn't adequate currently. The list
> of governors should never be traversed without locking in place. Also we
> must make sure the governor isn't removed while it is still referenced
> by code.
>
The locking around governors handling isn't adequate currently. The list
of governors should never be traversed without locking in place. Also we
must make sure the governor isn't removed while it is still referenced
by code.
Reported-by: Quentin Perret
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
5 matches
Mail list logo
