On 27 March 2013 17:05, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 15:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> I am still stuck at a issue, which i am not able to fix.
>> - cat of */cpufreq/ondemand/** isn't showing anything on console, but all
>> pointers are correctly set and i can see the right values with pr
On 27 March 2013 15:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I am still stuck at a issue, which i am not able to fix.
> - cat of */cpufreq/ondemand/** isn't showing anything on console, but all
> pointers are correctly set and i can see the right values with printk()
The culprit is the part where i changed pr
On 27 March 2013 09:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 01:18, Jacob Shin wrote:
>> Hmm .. I don't think this works for both ondemand and conservative
>> governors running at the same time .
Hi Jacob,
This must be early morning for you and you must be looking for something
to start with
On 27 March 2013 01:18, Jacob Shin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:02:15AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> +struct dbs_data *gdbs_data;
>> +
>
> Hmm .. I don't think this works for both ondemand and conservative
> governors running at the same time .
Yes, this should fix it (untested for now, i
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:02:15AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26 March 2013 20:50, Jacob Shin wrote:
> > Hi, latest bleeding-edge is spewing this out on boot:
> >
> > [3.585157] [ cut here ]
> > [3.592227] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xc8/0x100
On 26 March 2013 20:50, Jacob Shin wrote:
> Hi, latest bleeding-edge is spewing this out on boot:
>
> [3.585157] [ cut here ]
> [3.592227] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xc8/0x100()
> [3.599521] Hardware name: Dinar
> [3.606878] sysfs: cannot
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:44:40AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:59:13 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 4 March 2013 13:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > Currently, there can't be multiple instances of single governor_type. If
> > > we have
> > > a multi-package syste
On 22 March 2013 17:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, if the submitter wants to cheat, she/he certainly can this way, but
> what's the benefit, honestly? If the reviewer actually notices that there are
> more differences than the submitter admits to, the consequences may be quite
> unpleasant
On Friday, March 22, 2013 05:21:19 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, March 22, 2013 07:50:54 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> >> Hmm... I always thought fixups are way easy to review (and i still
> >> believe that's
> >> true) as they just
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, March 22, 2013 07:50:54 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Hmm... I always thought fixups are way easy to review (and i still
>> believe that's
>> true) as they just contain what got changed and so people don't have to
>> review
>> wh
On Friday, March 22, 2013 07:50:54 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 March 2013 05:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:59:13 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> >> I have queued all patches i had for 3.10 here:
> >>
> >> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=s
On 22 March 2013 05:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:59:13 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> I have queued all patches i had for 3.10 here:
>>
>> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-3.10
>
> OK, applied these to linux-pm.git/bl
On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:59:13 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 4 March 2013 13:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Currently, there can't be multiple instances of single governor_type. If we
> > have
> > a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy
> > (per
> > package),
On 4 March 2013 13:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Currently, there can't be multiple instances of single governor_type. If we
> have
> a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy (per
> package), we can't have multiple instances of same governor. i.e. We can't
> have
> m
Currently, there can't be multiple instances of single governor_type. If we have
a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy (per
package), we can't have multiple instances of same governor. i.e. We can't have
multiple instances of ondemand governor for multiple packag
15 matches
Mail list logo
