On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 01:04 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> Stephen, any news about this patch? I'm waiting for it to be merged in
>> order to resend some Tegra DTs, but still cannot see it in -next.
>
> To be honest, this became too painful to
On 04/10/2014 01:04 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Stephen, any news about this patch? I'm waiting for it to be merged in
> order to resend some Tegra DTs, but still cannot see it in -next.
To be honest, this became too painful to work on just to fix a warning
at boot which has no practical
> Stephen, any news about this patch? I'm waiting for it to be merged in
> order to resend some Tegra DTs, but still cannot see it in -next.
I doubt it's been applied.
No one got back to me with reference to how to deal with the set [1],
so I certainly didn't apply it.
[1]
Stephen, any news about this patch? I'm waiting for it to be merged in
order to resend some Tegra DTs, but still cannot see it in -next.
Thanks,
Alex.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> Implement the new DT property ti,irq-externally-inverted, and
Stephen, any news about this patch? I'm waiting for it to be merged in
order to resend some Tegra DTs, but still cannot see it in -next.
Thanks,
Alex.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Implement the new DT
Stephen, any news about this patch? I'm waiting for it to be merged in
order to resend some Tegra DTs, but still cannot see it in -next.
I doubt it's been applied.
No one got back to me with reference to how to deal with the set [1],
so I certainly didn't apply it.
[1]
On 04/10/2014 01:04 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Stephen, any news about this patch? I'm waiting for it to be merged in
order to resend some Tegra DTs, but still cannot see it in -next.
To be honest, this became too painful to work on just to fix a warning
at boot which has no practical
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 04/10/2014 01:04 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Stephen, any news about this patch? I'm waiting for it to be merged in
order to resend some Tegra DTs, but still cannot see it in -next.
To be honest, this became too
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> Implement the new DT property ti,irq-externally-inverted, and add an
> equivalent platform data field to match. This allows the driver to
> correctly automatically configure the IRQ output polarity when the board
> or SoC contains an inverter between the Palmas IRQ
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Implement the new DT property ti,irq-externally-inverted, and add an
equivalent platform data field to match. This allows the driver to
correctly automatically configure the IRQ output polarity when the board
or SoC contains an inverter between the
From: Stephen Warren
Implement the new DT property ti,irq-externally-inverted, and add an
equivalent platform data field to match. This allows the driver to
correctly automatically configure the IRQ output polarity when the board
or SoC contains an inverter between the Palmas IRQ output and IRQ
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Implement the new DT property ti,irq-externally-inverted, and add an
equivalent platform data field to match. This allows the driver to
correctly automatically configure the IRQ output polarity when the board
or SoC contains an inverter between the Palmas
12 matches
Mail list logo
