Ted,
Sorry for the top post but did you catch this reply? Generally the patch looks
good but I had a couple of questions because I don't fully grok the mount code
especially with regard to EXT2 support.
If you already saw it sorry for bothering you I just know that our email
servers sometimes
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:17:17AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:54:41PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, applied to the ext4-dax branch.
> >
>
> I spoke too soon. While I tried merging with the ext4.git dev branch,
> a merge conflict made me look
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:54:41PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>
> Thanks, applied to the ext4-dax branch.
>
I spoke too soon. While I tried merging with the ext4.git dev branch,
a merge conflict made me look closer and I realize I needed to make
the following changes (see diff between your
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 07:59:54AM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny
>
> Changes from V4:
> Fix up DAX mutual exclusion with other flags.
> Add clean up patch (remove jflags)
>
> Changes from V3:
> Change EXT4_DAX_FL to bit24
> Cache device DAX support
From: Ira Weiny
Changes from V4:
Fix up DAX mutual exclusion with other flags.
Add clean up patch (remove jflags)
Changes from V3:
Change EXT4_DAX_FL to bit24
Cache device DAX support in the super block and use that is
ext4_should_use_dax()
5 matches
Mail list logo
