On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Interrupts coming from Maxim77693 MUIC block (MicroUSB Interface
> Controller) were not handled at all because wrong regmap was used for
> MUIC's regmap_irq_chip.
>
> The MUIC component of Maxim 77693 uses different I2C address thus second
>
On 10/10/2014 05:22 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Interrupts coming from Maxim77693 MUIC block (MicroUSB Interface
> Controller) were not handled at all because wrong regmap was used for
> MUIC's regmap_irq_chip.
>
> The MUIC component of Maxim 77693 uses different I2C address thus second
>
Interrupts coming from Maxim77693 MUIC block (MicroUSB Interface
Controller) were not handled at all because wrong regmap was used for
MUIC's regmap_irq_chip.
The MUIC component of Maxim 77693 uses different I2C address thus second
regmap is created and used by max77693 extcon driver. The
Interrupts coming from Maxim77693 MUIC block (MicroUSB Interface
Controller) were not handled at all because wrong regmap was used for
MUIC's regmap_irq_chip.
The MUIC component of Maxim 77693 uses different I2C address thus second
regmap is created and used by max77693 extcon driver. The
On 10/10/2014 05:22 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Interrupts coming from Maxim77693 MUIC block (MicroUSB Interface
Controller) were not handled at all because wrong regmap was used for
MUIC's regmap_irq_chip.
The MUIC component of Maxim 77693 uses different I2C address thus second
regmap
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Interrupts coming from Maxim77693 MUIC block (MicroUSB Interface
Controller) were not handled at all because wrong regmap was used for
MUIC's regmap_irq_chip.
The MUIC component of Maxim 77693 uses different I2C address thus second
regmap is
6 matches
Mail list logo