On 2017/9/29 18:23, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:07:22PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
On 2017/9/28 20:59, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:56:59PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
On 2017/9/28 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at
On 2017/9/29 18:23, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:07:22PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
On 2017/9/28 20:59, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:56:59PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
On 2017/9/28 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:07:22PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/9/28 20:59, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:56:59PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2017/9/28 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0800, Wei Hu
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:07:22PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/9/28 20:59, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:56:59PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2017/9/28 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0800, Wei Hu
On 2017/9/28 20:59, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:56:59PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
On 2017/9/28 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
From: Lijun Ou
When lp_qp_work is NULL, it should be
On 2017/9/28 20:59, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:56:59PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
On 2017/9/28 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
From: Lijun Ou
When lp_qp_work is NULL, it should be returned ENOMEM.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:56:59PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/9/28 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
> > > From: Lijun Ou
> > >
> > > When lp_qp_work is NULL, it should be returned ENOMEM. This
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:56:59PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/9/28 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
> > > From: Lijun Ou
> > >
> > > When lp_qp_work is NULL, it should be returned ENOMEM. This patch
> > > mainly
On 2017/9/28 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
From: Lijun Ou
When lp_qp_work is NULL, it should be returned ENOMEM. This patch
mainly fixes it.
Ihis patch fixes the smatch error as below:
On 2017/9/28 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
From: Lijun Ou
When lp_qp_work is NULL, it should be returned ENOMEM. This patch
mainly fixes it.
Ihis patch fixes the smatch error as below:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
> From: Lijun Ou
>
> When lp_qp_work is NULL, it should be returned ENOMEM. This patch
> mainly fixes it.
>
> Ihis patch fixes the smatch error as below:
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c:918
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:57:28PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
> From: Lijun Ou
>
> When lp_qp_work is NULL, it should be returned ENOMEM. This patch
> mainly fixes it.
>
> Ihis patch fixes the smatch error as below:
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c:918 hns_roce_v1_recreate_lp_qp()
From: Lijun Ou
When lp_qp_work is NULL, it should be returned ENOMEM. This patch
mainly fixes it.
Ihis patch fixes the smatch error as below:
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c:918 hns_roce_v1_recreate_lp_qp()
error: potential null dereference 'lp_qp_work'. (kzalloc
From: Lijun Ou
When lp_qp_work is NULL, it should be returned ENOMEM. This patch
mainly fixes it.
Ihis patch fixes the smatch error as below:
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c:918 hns_roce_v1_recreate_lp_qp()
error: potential null dereference 'lp_qp_work'. (kzalloc returns null)
14 matches
Mail list logo