On 4/19/19 2:59 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 2:57 PM, shuah sh...@kernel.org wrote:
[...]
Should I drop this patch that is currently in linux-kseltest next? Just
confirming if your new patch is supposed to be applied on top of this
one or not?
We should keep this
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 2:57 PM, shuah sh...@kernel.org wrote:
[...]
> Should I drop this patch that is currently in linux-kseltest next? Just
> confirming if your new patch is supposed to be applied on top of this
> one or not?
We should keep this patch in linux-kselftest next. The fix applies
* Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> On smaller systems, running a test with 200 threads can take a long
> time on machines with smaller number of CPUs.
>
> Detect the number of online cpus at test runtime, and multiply that
> by 6 to have 6 rseq threads per cpu preempting each other.
>
>
On 4/19/19 8:40 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 10:17 AM, shuah sh...@kernel.org wrote:
On 4/19/19 7:48 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 9:42 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:55 AM, Mathieu
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> - On Apr 19, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
>
>> * Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>
>>> On smaller systems, running a test with 200 threads can take a long
>>> time on machines
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
>> On smaller systems, running a test with 200 threads can take a long
>> time on machines with smaller number of CPUs.
>>
>> Detect the number of online cpus at test runtime, and multiply
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 9:42 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> - On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:55 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>
>> - On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>>
>>>
On 4/19/19 7:48 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 9:42 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:55 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:55 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> - On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>
>> - On Apr 19, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
>>
>>> * Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Apr 19, 2019, at 10:17 AM, shuah sh...@kernel.org wrote:
> On 4/19/19 7:48 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Apr 19, 2019, at 9:42 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>>
>>> - On Apr 19, 2019, at 8:55 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>>>
On smaller systems, running a test with 200 threads can take a long
time on machines with smaller number of CPUs.
Detect the number of online cpus at test runtime, and multiply that
by 6 to have 6 rseq threads per cpu preempting each other.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers
Cc: Shuah Khan
Cc:
11 matches
Mail list logo