On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:44:57PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>The existing implementation accounts the whole DMA window in
>the locked_vm counter. This is going to be worse with multiple
>containers and huge DMA windows. Also, real-time accounting would requite
>additional tracking of
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:44:57PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The existing implementation accounts the whole DMA window in
the locked_vm counter. This is going to be worse with multiple
containers and huge DMA windows. Also, real-time accounting would requite
additional tracking of
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:40:49PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 06/02/2015 02:17 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> >On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:44:57PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>The existing implementation accounts the whole DMA window in
> >>the locked_vm counter. This is going to
On 06/02/2015 02:17 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:44:57PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The existing implementation accounts the whole DMA window in
the locked_vm counter. This is going to be worse with multiple
containers and huge DMA windows. Also, real-time
On 06/02/2015 02:17 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:44:57PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The existing implementation accounts the whole DMA window in
the locked_vm counter. This is going to be worse with multiple
containers and huge DMA windows. Also, real-time
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:40:49PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/02/2015 02:17 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:44:57PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The existing implementation accounts the whole DMA window in
the locked_vm counter. This is going to be worse
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:44:57PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> The existing implementation accounts the whole DMA window in
> the locked_vm counter. This is going to be worse with multiple
> containers and huge DMA windows. Also, real-time accounting would requite
> additional tracking of
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:44:57PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The existing implementation accounts the whole DMA window in
the locked_vm counter. This is going to be worse with multiple
containers and huge DMA windows. Also, real-time accounting would requite
additional tracking of
The existing implementation accounts the whole DMA window in
the locked_vm counter. This is going to be worse with multiple
containers and huge DMA windows. Also, real-time accounting would requite
additional tracking of accounted pages due to the page size difference -
IOMMU uses 4K pages and
The existing implementation accounts the whole DMA window in
the locked_vm counter. This is going to be worse with multiple
containers and huge DMA windows. Also, real-time accounting would requite
additional tracking of accounted pages due to the page size difference -
IOMMU uses 4K pages and
10 matches
Mail list logo
