- On Oct 13, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:56:55PM +0200, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Linux commit 27727df240c7 ("Avoid taking lock in NMI path with
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING"), changed the logic to open-code
>> the
- On Oct 13, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:56:55PM +0200, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Linux commit 27727df240c7 ("Avoid taking lock in NMI path with
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING"), changed the logic to open-code
>> the
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:56:55PM +0200, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Linux commit 27727df240c7 ("Avoid taking lock in NMI path with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING"), changed the logic to open-code
> the timekeeping_get_ns() function, but forgot to include
> the unit conversion from cycles to
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:56:55PM +0200, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Linux commit 27727df240c7 ("Avoid taking lock in NMI path with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING"), changed the logic to open-code
> the timekeeping_get_ns() function, but forgot to include
> the unit conversion from cycles to
Linux commit 27727df240c7 ("Avoid taking lock in NMI path with
CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING"), changed the logic to open-code
the timekeeping_get_ns() function, but forgot to include
the unit conversion from cycles to nanoseconds, breaking the
function's output, which impacts LTTng.
We expected Linux
Linux commit 27727df240c7 ("Avoid taking lock in NMI path with
CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING"), changed the logic to open-code
the timekeeping_get_ns() function, but forgot to include
the unit conversion from cycles to nanoseconds, breaking the
function's output, which impacts LTTng.
We expected Linux
6 matches
Mail list logo