On 11/01/2013 08:01 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
We don't validate iph->ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
skb whose iph->ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph->ihl
is evil (less than 5).
This issue were introduced by commit ec5efe7946280d1e84603389a1030ccec0a767ae
(rps:
On 11/01/2013 08:01 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
We don't validate iph-ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
skb whose iph-ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph-ihl
is evil (less than 5).
This issue were introduced by commit ec5efe7946280d1e84603389a1030ccec0a767ae
(rps:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:01:10PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We don't validate iph->ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
> skb whose iph->ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph->ihl
> is evil (less than 5).
>
> This issue were introduced by commit
From: Jason Wang
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:01:10 +0800
> We don't validate iph->ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
> skb whose iph->ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph->ihl
> is evil (less than 5).
>
> This issue were introduced by commit
From: Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:01:10 +0800
We don't validate iph-ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
skb whose iph-ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph-ihl
is evil (less than 5).
This issue were introduced by commit
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:01:10PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We don't validate iph-ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
skb whose iph-ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph-ihl
is evil (less than 5).
This issue were introduced by commit
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 15:01 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We don't validate iph->ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
> skb whose iph->ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph->ihl
> is evil (less than 5).
>
> This issue were introduced by commit
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 15:01 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We don't validate iph->ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
> skb whose iph->ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph->ihl
> is evil (less than 5).
>
> This issue were introduced by commit
We don't validate iph->ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
skb whose iph->ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph->ihl
is evil (less than 5).
This issue were introduced by commit ec5efe7946280d1e84603389a1030ccec0a767ae
(rps: support IPIP encapsulation).
Cc: Eric
We don't validate iph-ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
skb whose iph-ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph-ihl
is evil (less than 5).
This issue were introduced by commit ec5efe7946280d1e84603389a1030ccec0a767ae
(rps: support IPIP encapsulation).
Cc: Eric Dumazet
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 15:01 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We don't validate iph-ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
skb whose iph-ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph-ihl
is evil (less than 5).
This issue were introduced by commit
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 15:01 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We don't validate iph-ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
skb whose iph-ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph-ihl
is evil (less than 5).
This issue were introduced by commit
12 matches
Mail list logo