Re: [PATCH net-next] intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

2019-01-23 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 11:11 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Hi Jeffrey, > > On 1/23/19 11:04 AM, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 01:48 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch > > > cases > > > where we are expecting

Re: [PATCH net-next] intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

2019-01-23 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
Hi Jeffrey, On 1/23/19 11:04 AM, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 01:48 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases >> where we are expecting to fall through. >> >> This patch fixes the following warnings: >> >>

Re: [PATCH net-next] intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

2019-01-23 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 01:48 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > This patch fixes the following warnings: > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c:636:6: warning: this >

[PATCH net-next] intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

2019-01-22 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c:636:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]