On 11/12/20 5:53 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> I do agree, though, that it's confusing *what* they reported, especially
>> if the patch in question is fixing something *else*. Rather than invent
>> a new tag, maybe a comment would suffice:
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot # bug in earlier
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:43:56 -0800 Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/12/20 4:24 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote:
> >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot
> > Good people of kernel
On 11/12/20 4:24 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote:
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot
> Good people of kernel test robot, could you please rephrase this to say
> that the tag is
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:32:55 + Li, Philip wrote:
> > > Subject: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC
> with
> > > prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO
> > >
> > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:32:55 + Li, Philip wrote:
> > Subject: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with
> > prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote:
> > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as
> Subject: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with
> prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO
>
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote:
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot
>
> Good people
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote:
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot
Good people of kernel test robot, could you please rephrase this to say
that the tag is only appropriate if someone is sending a fix
Hi Dmytro,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dmytro-Shytyi/Re-PATCH-net-next-net-Variable-SLAAC-SLAAC-with-prefixes-of-arbitrary-length-in-PIO/2020-014800
base:
Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO (randomly
generated hostID or stable privacy + privacy extensions).
The main problem is that SLAAC RA or PD allocates a /64 by the Wireless
carrier 4G, 5G to a mobile hotspot, however segmentation of the /64 via
SLAAC is required so
9 matches
Mail list logo
