On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:35:56AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On the other hand and with all due respect, saying that it may have been
> 'buggy on some archs back in the day' and then not bringing any evidence
> is a bit of a strange claim to make.
You're right. I made the effort to look
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 08:46:57AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:01:49AM -0500, min.li...@renesas.com wrote:
> > From: Min Li
> >
> > Use div_s64 so that the neg_adj is not needed.
>
> Back in the day, I coded the neg_adj because there was some issue with
> signed 64
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:01:49AM -0500, min.li...@renesas.com wrote:
> From: Min Li
>
> Use div_s64 so that the neg_adj is not needed.
Back in the day, I coded the neg_adj because there was some issue with
signed 64 bit division that I can't recall now. Either div_s64 didn't
exist or it was
From: Min Li
Use div_s64 so that the neg_adj is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Min Li
---
drivers/ptp/ptp_idt82p33.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_idt82p33.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_idt82p33.c
index b1528a0..e970379d 100644
---
4 matches
Mail list logo
