Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/7] devmem TCP fixes

2024-11-01 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 06:14:14 -0700 Mina Almasry wrote: > But what is the 'missing input validation'? Do you mean the input > validation for the SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED API? That should be handled in > the patch "net: fix SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED looping too long" in this > series, unless I missed something.

Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/7] devmem TCP fixes

2024-11-01 Thread Mina Almasry
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:42 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:55:20 + Mina Almasry wrote: > > A few unrelated devmem TCP fixes bundled in a series for some > > convenience (if that's ok). > > These two should go to net I presume? It's missing input validation. > > Either way

Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/7] devmem TCP fixes

2024-10-31 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:55:20 + Mina Almasry wrote: > A few unrelated devmem TCP fixes bundled in a series for some > convenience (if that's ok). These two should go to net I presume? It's missing input validation. Either way you gotta repost either as two properly separate series, or combine

[PATCH net-next v1 0/7] devmem TCP fixes

2024-10-29 Thread Mina Almasry
A few unrelated devmem TCP fixes bundled in a series for some convenience (if that's ok). Patch 1-2: fix naming and provide page_pool_alloc_netmem for fragged netmem. Patch 3-4: fix issues with dma-buf dma addresses being potentially passed to dma_sync_for_* helpers. Patch 5-6: fix syzbot SO_DEV

[PATCH net-next v1 0/7] devmem TCP fixes

2024-10-29 Thread Mina Almasry
A few unrelated devmem TCP fixes bundled in a series for some convenience (if that's ok). Patch 1-2: fix naming and provide page_pool_alloc_netmem for fragged netmem. Patch 3-4: fix issues with dma-buf dma addresses being potentially passed to dma_sync_for_* helpers. Patch 5-6: fix syzbot SO_DEV