On 04-06-2020 15:48, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:47 AM Victor Julien wrote:
>>
>> On 02-06-2020 22:18, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 PM Victor Julien wrote:
On 02-06-2020 21:38, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:22
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:47 AM Victor Julien wrote:
>
> On 02-06-2020 22:18, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 PM Victor Julien wrote:
> >>
> >> On 02-06-2020 21:38, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:22 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>
> On
On 02-06-2020 22:18, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>>
>> On 02-06-2020 21:38, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:22 PM Victor Julien wrote:
On 02-06-2020 21:03, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:31
On 02-06-2020 22:18, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>>
>> On 02-06-2020 21:38, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:22 PM Victor Julien wrote:
On 02-06-2020 21:03, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:31
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>
> On 02-06-2020 21:38, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:22 PM Victor Julien wrote:
> >>
> >> On 02-06-2020 21:03, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:31 PM Victor Julien wrote:
> On 02-06-2020
On 02-06-2020 21:38, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:22 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>>
>> On 02-06-2020 21:03, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:31 PM Victor Julien wrote:
On 02-06-2020 19:37, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM
On 02-06-2020 21:29, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:22:11 +0200 Victor Julien wrote:
>> - receiver uses nfp (netronome) driver: TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID set for
>> every packet, including the bad TCP ones
>> - receiver uses ixgbe driver: TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID not set for the bad
>>
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:22 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>
> On 02-06-2020 21:03, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:31 PM Victor Julien wrote:
> >> On 02-06-2020 19:37, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>
> On 02-06-2020
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:22:11 +0200 Victor Julien wrote:
> - receiver uses nfp (netronome) driver: TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID set for
> every packet, including the bad TCP ones
> - receiver uses ixgbe driver: TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID not set for the bad
> packets.
>
> Again purely based on 'git grep' it
On 02-06-2020 21:03, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:31 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>> On 02-06-2020 19:37, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Victor Julien wrote:
On 02-06-2020 16:29, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 AM
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:31 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>
> Hi Willem,
>
> On 02-06-2020 19:37, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Victor Julien wrote:
> >>
> >> On 02-06-2020 16:29, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 AM Victor Julien wrote:
>
>
Hi Willem,
On 02-06-2020 19:37, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>>
>> On 02-06-2020 16:29, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 AM Victor Julien wrote:
Introduce a new flag (TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY) to indicate
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Victor Julien wrote:
>
> On 02-06-2020 16:29, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 AM Victor Julien wrote:
> >>
> >> Introduce a new flag (TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY) to indicate
> >> that the driver has completely validated the checksums in the
On 02-06-2020 16:29, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 AM Victor Julien wrote:
>>
>> Introduce a new flag (TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY) to indicate
>> that the driver has completely validated the checksums in the packet.
>>
>> The TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY flag differs from
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 AM Victor Julien wrote:
>
> Introduce a new flag (TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY) to indicate
> that the driver has completely validated the checksums in the packet.
>
> The TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY flag differs from TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID
> in that the new flag will only
Need to learn how to properly do git sendpatch, apologies if i'm not
following proper procedures.
This v2 fixes up the doc. The output is now tested with rst2pdf and
looks good. Added in a trivial related doc fixup.
I wasn't completely sure if I was supposed to use tabs or spaces in rst,
so did
Introduce a new flag (TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY) to indicate
that the driver has completely validated the checksums in the packet.
The TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY flag differs from TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID
in that the new flag will only be set if all the layers are valid,
while TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID
17 matches
Mail list logo