Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

From: "Naveen N. Rao" Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:32:56 +0530 > Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to > sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get > covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit

Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

From: "Naveen N. Rao" Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:32:56 +0530 > Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to > sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get > covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to > quickly tag the

Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

On 04/05/2016 12:02 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to quickly tag the precise problem. Cc:

Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

On 04/05/2016 12:02 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to quickly tag the precise problem. Cc:

Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

On 2016/04/05 09:28AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > >Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to > >sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get > >covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit

Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

On 2016/04/05 09:28AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > >Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to > >sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get > >covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit

Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to quickly tag the precise problem. Cc: Alexei

Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to quickly tag the precise problem. Cc: Alexei

[PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to quickly tag the precise problem. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel

[PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to quickly tag the precise problem. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: