Re: [PATCH net v2] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

From: Jarod Wilson Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 19:43:45 -0400 > As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not > removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count > is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the

Re: [PATCH net v2] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

From: Jarod Wilson Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 19:43:45 -0400 > As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not > removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count > is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the number > of ports in

[PATCH net v2] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the number of ports in the aggregator that are still enabled. The sysfs spew for

[PATCH net v2] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the number of ports in the aggregator that are still enabled. The sysfs spew for