On Thu, Apr 21 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 08:10 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > I wondered about this action recently myself. What is the point in
> > requeueing this request, only to call scsi_run_queue() ->
> > blk_run_queue() -> issue same request. If the point really is
On Thu, Apr 21 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 08:10 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
I wondered about this action recently myself. What is the point in
requeueing this request, only to call scsi_run_queue() -
blk_run_queue() - issue same request. If the point really is to
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 08:10 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I wondered about this action recently myself. What is the point in
> requeueing this request, only to call scsi_run_queue() ->
> blk_run_queue() -> issue same request. If the point really is to reissue
> the request immediately, I can think of
On Wed, Apr 20 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > -* Insert this command at the head of the queue for it's device.
> > -* It will go before all other commands that are already in the queue.
> > -*
> > -* NOTE: there is magic here
On Wed, Apr 20 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
-* Insert this command at the head of the queue for it's device.
-* It will go before all other commands that are already in the queue.
-*
-* NOTE: there is magic here about the
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 08:10 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
I wondered about this action recently myself. What is the point in
requeueing this request, only to call scsi_run_queue() -
blk_run_queue() - issue same request. If the point really is to reissue
the request immediately, I can think of many
Hello, James.
This is the modified patch with the comment (slightly modified).
With this patch, the next patch in this patchset complains about line
offset but it's okay.
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: scsi-reqfn-export/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 09:20 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> Hello, James.
>>
>>James Bottomley wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>
>>>
-* Insert this command at the head of the queue for it's device.
-* It will go before all
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 09:20 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, James.
>
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> >>-* Insert this command at the head of the queue for it's device.
> >>-* It will go before all other commands that are already
Hello, James.
James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
- * Insert this command at the head of the queue for it's device.
- * It will go before all other commands that are already in the queue.
- *
- * NOTE: there is magic here about the way the queue is
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> - * Insert this command at the head of the queue for it's device.
> - * It will go before all other commands that are already in the queue.
> - *
> - * NOTE: there is magic here about the way the queue is plugged if
> -
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
- * Insert this command at the head of the queue for it's device.
- * It will go before all other commands that are already in the queue.
- *
- * NOTE: there is magic here about the way the queue is plugged if
- * we
Hello, James.
James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
- * Insert this command at the head of the queue for it's device.
- * It will go before all other commands that are already in the queue.
- *
- * NOTE: there is magic here about the way the queue is
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 09:20 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, James.
James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
-* Insert this command at the head of the queue for it's device.
-* It will go before all other commands that are already in the queue.
James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 09:20 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, James.
James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
-* Insert this command at the head of the queue for it's device.
-* It will go before all other commands that are
Hello, James.
This is the modified patch with the comment (slightly modified).
With this patch, the next patch in this patchset complains about line
offset but it's okay.
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: scsi-reqfn-export/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
03_scsi_REQ_SPECIAL_semantic_scsi_queue_insert.patch
scsi_queue_insert() used to use blk_insert_request() for
requeueing requests. This depends on the unobvious behavior
of blk_insert_request() setting REQ_SPECIAL and
REQ_SOFTBARRIER when requeueing. This patch
03_scsi_REQ_SPECIAL_semantic_scsi_queue_insert.patch
scsi_queue_insert() used to use blk_insert_request() for
requeueing requests. This depends on the unobvious behavior
of blk_insert_request() setting REQ_SPECIAL and
REQ_SOFTBARRIER when requeueing. This patch
18 matches
Mail list logo
