On 09/30/2013 04:23 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:24:52PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 09/27/2013 10:29 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> On 09/27/2013 02:33 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:57:39AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 09/26/2013 04:16 AM,
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:24:52PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 10:29 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> > On 09/27/2013 02:33 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:57:39AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> >>> On 09/26/2013 04:16 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013
On 09/27/2013 10:29 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 02:33 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:57:39AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> On 09/26/2013 04:16 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:55:30AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> Thank you for your
On 09/27/2013 02:33 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:57:39AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 09/26/2013 04:16 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:55:30AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
Thank you for your whole work, firstly :-).
And your su
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:57:39AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 09/26/2013 04:16 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:55:30AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you for your whole work, firstly :-).
> >>
> >> And your suggestion about testing (in our discussion) is also
On 09/26/2013 04:16 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:55:30AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for your whole work, firstly :-).
>>
>> And your suggestion about testing (in our discussion) is also valuable
>> to me.
>>
>> I need start LTP in q4. After referenced your
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:55:30AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> Thank you for your whole work, firstly :-).
>
> And your suggestion about testing (in our discussion) is also valuable
> to me.
>
> I need start LTP in q4. After referenced your suggestion, my first step
> for using/learning LTP is
Thank you for your whole work, firstly :-).
And your suggestion about testing (in our discussion) is also valuable
to me.
I need start LTP in q4. After referenced your suggestion, my first step
for using/learning LTP is not mainly for finding kernel issues, but for
testing kernel (to improve m
From: "Paul E. McKenney"
The for_each_rcu_flavor() loop unconditionally scans all flavors, even
when the first flavor might have some non-lazy callbacks. Once the
loop has seen a non-lazy callback, further passes through the loop
cannot change the state. This is not a huge problem, given that t
9 matches
Mail list logo