On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:27:13AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On May 26, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> >> Should have tested on more than just x86, it appears. We've started
>> >> hammering on this internally across all
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:27:13AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On May 26, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> >> Should have tested on more than just x86, it appears. We've started
>> >> hammering on this internally across all
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:27:13AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On May 26, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >> Should have tested on more than just x86, it appears. We've started
> >> hammering on this internally across all arches, and its exploded
> >> multiple times on ppc64 now:
>
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On May 26, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 5/8/2015 8:28 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Jarod Wilson jwil...@redhat.com wrote:
On May 26, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 5/8/2015 8:28 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:27:13AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On May 26, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
Should have tested on more than just x86, it appears. We've started
hammering on this internally across all arches, and its exploded
multiple times on
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Jan Stancek jstan...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:27:13AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On May 26, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
Should have tested on more than just x86, it appears. We've started
hammering on this
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Jan Stancek jstan...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:27:13AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On May 26, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
Should have tested on more than just x86, it appears. We've started
hammering on this
On May 26, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>> On 5/8/2015 8:28 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>>> /proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
>>>
>>>$ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037)
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On 5/8/2015 8:28 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > /proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
> >
> > $ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037) 2>/dev/null
> >
> > However, command line size was never limited
On 5/8/2015 8:28 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
$ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037) 2>/dev/null
However, command line size was never limited to PAGE_SIZE but to 128 KB and
relatively recently limitation was removed
On May 26, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 5/8/2015 8:28 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
$ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037)
On 5/8/2015 8:28 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
$ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037) 2/dev/null
However, command line size was never limited to PAGE_SIZE but to 128 KB and
relatively recently limitation was removed
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 5/8/2015 8:28 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
$ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037) 2/dev/null
However, command line size was never limited to
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:32:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:28:05 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> > /proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
>
> I still hate your patch!
>
>
> Also, dude. i386:
Someone sent i386 removal patch a
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:32:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:28:05 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
I still hate your patch!
Also, dude. i386:
Someone sent i386 removal
On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:28:05 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> /proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
>
> $ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037) 2>/dev/null
>
> However, command line size was never limited to PAGE_SIZE but to 128 KB and
> relatively recently
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
$ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037) 2>/dev/null
However, command line size was never limited to PAGE_SIZE but to 128 KB and
relatively recently limitation was removed altogether.
People noticed and ask questions:
On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:28:05 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
$ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037) 2/dev/null
However, command line size was never limited to PAGE_SIZE but to 128 KB and
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with
$ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037) 2/dev/null
However, command line size was never limited to PAGE_SIZE but to 128 KB and
relatively recently limitation was removed altogether.
People noticed and ask questions:
20 matches
Mail list logo