On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 19:31 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> time64_t is 64-bit width type, we are not supposed to supply lesser ones
> as in the case of rpi_firmware_print_firmware_revision() after the commit
> 4a60f58ee002 ("ARM: bcm2835: Switch to use %ptT"). Use temporary variable
> of time64_t
On Tue 2020-06-16 18:42:00, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 19:31 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > time64_t is 64-bit width type, we are not supposed to supply lesser ones
> > as in the case of rpi_firmware_print_firmware_revision() after the commit
> > 4a60f58ee002 ("ARM: bc
On (20/06/16 18:42), Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 19:31 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > time64_t is 64-bit width type, we are not supposed to supply lesser ones
> > as in the case of rpi_firmware_print_firmware_revision() after the commit
> > 4a60f58ee002 ("ARM: bcm2835:
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 19:31 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> time64_t is 64-bit width type, we are not supposed to supply lesser ones
> as in the case of rpi_firmware_print_firmware_revision() after the commit
> 4a60f58ee002 ("ARM: bcm2835: Switch to use %ptT"). Use temporary variable
> of time64_t
time64_t is 64-bit width type, we are not supposed to supply lesser ones
as in the case of rpi_firmware_print_firmware_revision() after the commit
4a60f58ee002 ("ARM: bcm2835: Switch to use %ptT"). Use temporary variable
of time64_t type to correctly handle lesser types.
Fixes: 4a60f58ee002 ("ARM:
5 matches
Mail list logo