On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:04 AM Michael Walle wrote:
>
> Hi Saravana,
>
> Am 2020-05-26 09:07, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> >> Greg,
> >>
> >> I think this is the issue Michael ran into. I'd like him to test the
> >> fix
> >> before it's pulled in.
> >>
> >> Michael,
> >>
> >> If you can test this o
Hi Saravana,
Am 2020-05-26 09:07, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
Greg,
I think this is the issue Michael ran into. I'd like him to test the
fix
before it's pulled in.
Michael,
If you can test this on the branch you saw the issue in and give a
Tested-by if it works, that'd be great.
Unfortunatel
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 9:05 AM Saravana Kannan wrote:
>
> When SYNC_STATE_ONLY support was added in commit 05ef983e0d65 ("driver
> core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag"),
> SYNC_STATE_ONLY links were treated similar to STATELESS links in terms
> of not blocking consumer probe if
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:05 AM Saravana Kannan wrote:
>
> When SYNC_STATE_ONLY support was added in commit 05ef983e0d65 ("driver
> core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag"),
> SYNC_STATE_ONLY links were treated similar to STATELESS links in terms
> of not blocking consumer probe i
When SYNC_STATE_ONLY support was added in commit 05ef983e0d65 ("driver
core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag"),
SYNC_STATE_ONLY links were treated similar to STATELESS links in terms
of not blocking consumer probe if the supplier hasn't probed yet.
That caused a SYNC_STATE_ONLY de
5 matches
Mail list logo
