On 23.09.19 14:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 23-09-19 14:20:05, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 23.09.19 14:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Mon 23-09-19 13:34:18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 23.09.19 13:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> [...]
> I am wondering why those pages get onlined when
On Mon 23-09-19 14:20:05, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 23.09.19 14:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 23-09-19 13:34:18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 23.09.19 13:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> >>> I am wondering why those pages get onlined when they are, in fact,
> >>> supposed to be
On 23.09.19 14:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 23-09-19 13:34:18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 23.09.19 13:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> I am wondering why those pages get onlined when they are, in fact,
>>> supposed to be offline.
>>>
>>
>> It's the current way of emulating
On Mon 23-09-19 13:34:18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 23.09.19 13:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > I am wondering why those pages get onlined when they are, in fact,
> > supposed to be offline.
> >
>
> It's the current way of emulating sub-memory-block hotplug on top of the
> memory bock
On 23.09.19 13:34, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 23.09.19 13:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Mon 23-09-19 11:31:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 23.09.19 10:58, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 20-09-19 10:17:54, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.09.19 13:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
On 23.09.19 13:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 23-09-19 11:31:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 23.09.19 10:58, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Fri 20-09-19 10:17:54, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 09.09.19 13:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Based on linux/next + "[PATCH 0/3] Remove
On Mon 23-09-19 11:31:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 23.09.19 10:58, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 20-09-19 10:17:54, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 09.09.19 13:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>> Based on linux/next + "[PATCH 0/3] Remove __online_page_set_limits()"
> >>>
> >>> Let's replace
On 23.09.19 10:58, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 20-09-19 10:17:54, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 09.09.19 13:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Based on linux/next + "[PATCH 0/3] Remove __online_page_set_limits()"
>>>
>>> Let's replace the __online_page...() functions by generic_online_page().
>>>
On Fri 20-09-19 10:17:54, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.09.19 13:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > Based on linux/next + "[PATCH 0/3] Remove __online_page_set_limits()"
> >
> > Let's replace the __online_page...() functions by generic_online_page().
> > Hyper-V only wants to delay the actual
On 09.09.19 13:48, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Based on linux/next + "[PATCH 0/3] Remove __online_page_set_limits()"
>
> Let's replace the __online_page...() functions by generic_online_page().
> Hyper-V only wants to delay the actual onlining of un-backed pages, so we
> can simpy re-use the
Based on linux/next + "[PATCH 0/3] Remove __online_page_set_limits()"
Let's replace the __online_page...() functions by generic_online_page().
Hyper-V only wants to delay the actual onlining of un-backed pages, so we
can simpy re-use the generic function.
Only compile-tested.
Cc: Souptick
11 matches
Mail list logo