Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-15 Thread Vinayak Menon
On 6/15/2016 6:27 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Yeb, I read Johannes's thread which suggests one-cgroup-per-app model. > It does make sense to me. It is worth to try although I guess it's not > easy to control memory usage on demand, not proactively. > If we can do, maybe we don't need per-process

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-15 Thread Vinayak Menon
On 6/15/2016 6:27 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Yeb, I read Johannes's thread which suggests one-cgroup-per-app model. > It does make sense to me. It is worth to try although I guess it's not > easy to control memory usage on demand, not proactively. > If we can do, maybe we don't need per-process

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-14 Thread Minchan Kim
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 06:59:40PM +0530, Vinayak Menon wrote: > On 6/13/2016 1:20 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 > > > > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last > > feedback from akpm was that he want to know

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-14 Thread Minchan Kim
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 06:59:40PM +0530, Vinayak Menon wrote: > On 6/13/2016 1:20 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 > > > > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last > > feedback from akpm was that he want to know

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-14 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi Chen, On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:50:00PM +0800, Chen Feng wrote: > Hi Minchan, > > On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 > > > > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last > > feedback from akpm was

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-14 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi Chen, On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:50:00PM +0800, Chen Feng wrote: > Hi Minchan, > > On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 > > > > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last > > feedback from akpm was

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-13 Thread Vinayak Menon
On 6/13/2016 1:20 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi all, > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 > > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last > feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario. > > Since then, I got question from several embedded

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-13 Thread Vinayak Menon
On 6/13/2016 1:20 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi all, > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 > > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last > feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario. > > Since then, I got question from several embedded

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-13 Thread ZhaoJunmin Zhao(Junmin)
在 2016/6/13 19:50, Chen Feng 写道: Hi Minchan, On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi all, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario. Since then, I

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-13 Thread ZhaoJunmin Zhao(Junmin)
在 2016/6/13 19:50, Chen Feng 写道: Hi Minchan, On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote: Hi all, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario. Since then, I

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-13 Thread Chen Feng
Hi Minchan, On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi all, > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 > > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last > feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario. > > Since then, I got question from

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-13 Thread Chen Feng
Hi Minchan, On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi all, > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 > > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last > feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario. > > Since then, I got question from

[PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-13 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi all, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario. Since then, I got question from several embedded people of various company "why it's not merged into

[PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim

2016-06-13 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi all, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728 I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario. Since then, I got question from several embedded people of various company "why it's not merged into