On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 2:31 PM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 9:54 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 03:37:07PM -0700, Sandeep Patil wrote:
> > > We are trying to make sure that all (most) drivers in an Aarch64 system
> > > can
> > > be kernel
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 9:54 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 03:37:07PM -0700, Sandeep Patil wrote:
> > We are trying to make sure that all (most) drivers in an Aarch64 system can
> > be kernel modules for Android, like any other desktop system for
> > example. There are
On 6/25/19 9:30 PM, Sandeep Patil wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:53:13AM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 03:37:07PM -0700, Sandeep Patil wrote:
>>> We are trying to make sure that all (most) drivers in an Aarch64 system can
>>> be kernel modules for Android, like
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:53:13AM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 03:37:07PM -0700, Sandeep Patil wrote:
> > We are trying to make sure that all (most) drivers in an Aarch64 system can
> > be kernel modules for Android, like any other desktop system for
> > example.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 03:37:07PM -0700, Sandeep Patil wrote:
> We are trying to make sure that all (most) drivers in an Aarch64 system can
> be kernel modules for Android, like any other desktop system for
> example. There are a number of problems we need to fix before that happens
> ofcourse.
(Responding to the first email in the series to summarize the current
situation and choices we have.)
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 05:32:13PM -0700, 'Saravana Kannan' via kernel-team
wrote:
> Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory
> functional dependencies between
Adding cc: David Collins
Plus my comments below.
On 6/3/19 5:32 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory
> functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the
> devices are created (but before they are probed) by looking at
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:21 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> Adding cc: David Collins
>
> Plus my comments below.
>
> On 6/3/19 5:32 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory
> > functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:56 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> Hi Saravana,
>
> On 5/24/19 9:04 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:40 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Saranova,
> >>
> >> I'll try to address the other portions of this email that I
> >> in my previous replies.
>
Hi Saravana,
On 5/24/19 9:04 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:40 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> Hi Saranova,
>>
>> I'll try to address the other portions of this email that I
>> in my previous replies.
>>
>>
>> On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 24,
Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory
functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the
devices are created (but before they are probed) by looking at this
"depends-on" property.
This property is used instead of existing DT properties that specify
Hello Saravana,
On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
...
> Having functional dependencies explicitly called out in DT and
> automatically added before the devices are probed, provides the
> following benefits:
...
> - Supplier devices like clock providers, regulators providers, etc
> need
Sending again because email client somehow reverted to HTML.
Frank, Rob, Mark,
Gentle reminder. I've replied to your emails spread across the
different patches in the series. Hoping they address your questions
and concerns. Please let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Saravana
On Wed, May 29,
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:40 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> Hi Saranova,
>
> I'll try to address the other portions of this email that I
> in my previous replies.
>
>
> On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/23/19 6:01
Hi Saranova,
I'll try to address the other portions of this email that I
in my previous replies.
On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>>> Add a generic "depends-on" property that
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:52 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 06:01:11PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory
> > functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the
> > devices are created
Ugh... mobile app is sending HTML emails. Replying again.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:25 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 5/24/19 5:22 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 5/23/19 6:01
On 5/24/19 5:22 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>
> < snip >
>
>>> Another flaw with this method is that existing device trees
>>> will be broken after
On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
< snip >
>> Another flaw with this method is that existing device trees
>> will be broken after the kernel is modified, because existing
>> device
Hi Saravana,
On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
< snip >
>
> -Saravana
>
There were several different topics in your email. I am going to do
separate replies for different topics
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory
> > functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the
> > devices are created (but before they are probed)
Before I address all the comments, a friendly reminder: Whatever
solution we come up with needs to work on a system with loadable
modules and shouldn't depend on userspace for correctness.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 6:04 AM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:01 PM Saravana Kannan
On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory
> functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the
> devices are created (but before they are probed) by looking at this
> "depends-on" property.
>
> This property
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:01 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
>
> Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory
> functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the
> devices are created (but before they are probed) by looking at this
> "depends-on" property.
The
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 06:01:11PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory
> functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the
> devices are created (but before they are probed) by looking at this
> "depends-on"
Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory
functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the
devices are created (but before they are probed) by looking at this
"depends-on" property.
This property is used instead of existing DT properties that specify
26 matches
Mail list logo