On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:49 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 07:19:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 04:11:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:03 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 07:19:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 04:11:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:03 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:03:28PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:03 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:03:28PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the
> > > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:03:28PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the
> > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams
Thank
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the
> object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams
Wilczynski, Michal wrote:
>
>
> On 10/2/2023 3:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the
> > object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
> > ---
> >
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 04:54:58PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the
> object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant.
Dan, do you have any comments?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:27:02PM +0200, Wilczynski, Michal wrote:
> On 10/2/2023 3:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > + out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, guid, revid, func, _obj,
> > ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
>
> This line is 90 characters long, wouldn't it be better to split it ?
I
On 10/2/2023 3:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the
> object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
> ---
> drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2
On 10/2/23 06:54, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the
> object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang
> ---
> drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 5 ++---
> 1
The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the
object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
---
drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
11 matches
Mail list logo