On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * Match specific microcodes or steppings.
> >
> > What means microcodes or steppings? If you mean microcode revisions then
> >
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * Match specific microcodes or steppings.
> >
> > What means microcodes or steppings? If you mean microcode revisions then
> >
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 11:15:07AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The matcher can be used to match specific hardware steppings by setting
> the min/max_ucode to 0 or specific microcode revisions
> (which are associated with steppings)
This better be explained unambiguously.
> We still support the
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 11:15:07AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The matcher can be used to match specific hardware steppings by setting
> the min/max_ucode to 0 or specific microcode revisions
> (which are associated with steppings)
This better be explained unambiguously.
> We still support the
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Match specific microcodes or steppings.
>
> What means microcodes or steppings? If you mean microcode revisions then
> please spell it out and use it all over the place.
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Match specific microcodes or steppings.
>
> What means microcodes or steppings? If you mean microcode revisions then
> please spell it out and use it all over the place.
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Match specific microcodes or steppings.
>
> What means microcodes or steppings? If you mean microcode revisions then
> please spell it out and use it all over the place. steppings is confusing
> at
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Match specific microcodes or steppings.
>
> What means microcodes or steppings? If you mean microcode revisions then
> please spell it out and use it all over the place. steppings is confusing
> at
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> +/*
> + * Match specific microcodes or steppings.
What means microcodes or steppings? If you mean microcode revisions then
please spell it out and use it all over the place. steppings is confusing
at best as its associated to the CPU stepping.
> + *
> + *
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> +/*
> + * Match specific microcodes or steppings.
What means microcodes or steppings? If you mean microcode revisions then
please spell it out and use it all over the place. steppings is confusing
at best as its associated to the CPU stepping.
> + *
> + *
From: Andi Kleen
For bug workarounds or checks it is useful to check for specific
microcode versions. Add a new table format to check for steppings
with min/max microcode revisions.
This does not change the existing x86_cpu_id because it's an ABI
shared with modutils, and also has quite
From: Andi Kleen
For bug workarounds or checks it is useful to check for specific
microcode versions. Add a new table format to check for steppings
with min/max microcode revisions.
This does not change the existing x86_cpu_id because it's an ABI
shared with modutils, and also has quite
12 matches
Mail list logo
