On April 17, 2019 5:20:55 PM GMT+02:00, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>On 04/17, Christian Brauner wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 04:01:06PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> > On 04/16, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> > >
>> > > @@ -3581,12 +3588,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(pidfd_send_signal, int,
>pidfd, int,
On 04/17, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 04:01:06PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 04/16, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -3581,12 +3588,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(pidfd_send_signal, int, pidfd,
> > > int, sig,
> > > if (flags)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 04:01:06PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/16, Christian Brauner wrote:
> >
> > @@ -3581,12 +3588,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(pidfd_send_signal, int, pidfd, int,
> > sig,
> > if (flags)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - f = fdget_raw(pidfd);
> > + f =
On 04/16, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> @@ -3581,12 +3588,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(pidfd_send_signal, int, pidfd, int,
> sig,
> if (flags)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - f = fdget_raw(pidfd);
> + f = fdget(pidfd);
could you explain this change?
I am just curious, I don't
Let pidfd_send_signal() use pidfds retrieved via CLONE_PIDFD. With this
patch pidfd_send_signal() becomes independent of procfs. This fullfils the
request made when we merged the pidfd_send_signal() patchset. The
pidfd_send_signal() syscall is now always available allowing for it to be
used by
5 matches
Mail list logo