Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-12-02 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 29/11/15 17:27, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 18/11/15 07:33, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> >> >> On 17 November 2015 23:47:16 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton >> wrote: >>> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 + Jonathan Cameron >>> wrote: >>> On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-12-02 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 29/11/15 17:27, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 18/11/15 07:33, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> >> >> On 17 November 2015 23:47:16 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton >> wrote: >>> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 + Jonathan Cameron >>> wrote: >>> On 11/11/15

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-29 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 18/11/15 07:33, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On 17 November 2015 23:47:16 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton > wrote: >> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 + Jonathan Cameron >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-29 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 18/11/15 07:33, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On 17 November 2015 23:47:16 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton > wrote: >> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 + Jonathan Cameron >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On 10

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-17 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 17 November 2015 23:47:16 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton wrote: >On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 + Jonathan Cameron >wrote: > >> On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 + Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > > On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig > >> wrote: > >> > >>> is this simple addition

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 + Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > > On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-17 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 17 November 2015 23:47:16 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton wrote: >On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 + Jonathan Cameron >wrote: > >> On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-15 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton > wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig >> wrote: >> >>> is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus >>> for this merge window? I would make

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-15 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton > wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig >> wrote: >> >>> is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-11 Thread Joel Becker
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:12:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus > > for this merge window? I would make my life easier to have it in > > so I could start using

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-11 Thread Joel Becker
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:12:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus > > for this merge window? I would make my life easier to have it in > > so I could

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-10 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton wrote: >On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig >wrote: > >> is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus >> for this merge window? I would make my life easier to have it in >> so I could start using it

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus > for this merge window? I would make my life easier to have it in > so I could start using it in patches for various trees in the next > merge window. It's super

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus > for this merge window? I would make my life easier to have it in > so I could start using it in patches for various trees in the next > merge window.

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-10 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton wrote: >On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig >wrote: > >> is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus >> for this merge window? I would make my life easier to

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Andrew, is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus for this merge window? I would make my life easier to have it in so I could start using it in patches for various trees in the next merge window. Thanks, Christoph On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:33:27PM +0300,

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Andrew, is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus for this merge window? I would make my life easier to have it in so I could start using it in patches for various trees in the next merge window. Thanks, Christoph On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:33:27PM +0300,

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-08 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 07/11/15 13:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:38:53PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> Yup. I'd have no objection to a direct request to Linus to take this as a >> one off. > > I'd appreciate if you could give it a try. Unfortunately this would fall out of scope for

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-08 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 07/11/15 13:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:38:53PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> Yup. I'd have no objection to a direct request to Linus to take this as a >> one off. > > I'd appreciate if you could give it a try. Unfortunately this would fall out of scope for

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-07 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:38:53PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > Yup. I'd have no objection to a direct request to Linus to take this as a one > off. I'd appreciate if you could give it a try. > Or we can do an immutable branch and pull it into all relevant subtrees so all > users can hit

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-07 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:38:53PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > Yup. I'd have no objection to a direct request to Linus to take this as a one > off. I'd appreciate if you could give it a try. > Or we can do an immutable branch and pull it into all relevant subtrees so all > users can hit

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-06 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 11/06/2015 09:48 AM, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Is this going into 4.4 through the iio tree? If not is there any chance >> to get it in through some other tree? While we're not past the merge >> window is trivial new functionality that

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-06 Thread Daniel Baluta
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Is this going into 4.4 through the iio tree? If not is there any chance > to get it in through some other tree? While we're not past the merge > window is trivial new functionality that doesn't change code, and I'd like to > move

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-06 Thread Daniel Baluta
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Is this going into 4.4 through the iio tree? If not is there any chance > to get it in through some other tree? While we're not past the merge > window is trivial new functionality that doesn't change code, and I'd like to

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-06 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 11/06/2015 09:48 AM, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Is this going into 4.4 through the iio tree? If not is there any chance >> to get it in through some other tree? While we're not past the merge >> window is trivial new

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Is this going into 4.4 through the iio tree? If not is there any chance to get it in through some other tree? While we're not past the merge window is trivial new functionality that doesn't change code, and I'd like to move existing configfs users over to it ASAP, so getting it into a baseline

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-11-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Is this going into 4.4 through the iio tree? If not is there any chance to get it in through some other tree? While we're not past the merge window is trivial new functionality that doesn't change code, and I'd like to move existing configfs users over to it ASAP, so getting it into a baseline

[PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-10-23 Thread Daniel Baluta
We don't want to hardcode default groups at subsystem creation time. We export: * configfs_register_group * configfs_unregister_group to allow drivers to programatically create/destroy groups later, after module init time. This is needed for IIO configfs support. Suggested-by:

[PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

2015-10-23 Thread Daniel Baluta
We don't want to hardcode default groups at subsystem creation time. We export: * configfs_register_group * configfs_unregister_group to allow drivers to programatically create/destroy groups later, after module init time. This is needed for IIO configfs support. Suggested-by: