On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:54:29 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 10:58 +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> > Patch written by Antonios Motakis :
> >
> > IOMMU groups are expected by certain users of the IOMMU API,
> > e.g. VFIO. Since each device is behind its own System MMU, we
> > can
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:54:29 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 10:58 +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
Patch written by Antonios Motakis a.mota...@virtualopensystems.com:
IOMMU groups are expected by certain users of the IOMMU API,
e.g. VFIO. Since each device is behind its own
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 10:58 +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> Patch written by Antonios Motakis :
>
> IOMMU groups are expected by certain users of the IOMMU API,
> e.g. VFIO. Since each device is behind its own System MMU, we
> can allocate a new IOMMU group for each device.
>
> Reviewd-by: Cho
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 10:58 +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote:
Patch written by Antonios Motakis a.mota...@virtualopensystems.com:
IOMMU groups are expected by certain users of the IOMMU API,
e.g. VFIO. Since each device is behind its own System MMU, we
can allocate a new IOMMU group for each device.
Patch written by Antonios Motakis :
IOMMU groups are expected by certain users of the IOMMU API,
e.g. VFIO. Since each device is behind its own System MMU, we
can allocate a new IOMMU group for each device.
Reviewd-by: Cho KyongHo
Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis
---
Patch written by Antonios Motakis a.mota...@virtualopensystems.com:
IOMMU groups are expected by certain users of the IOMMU API,
e.g. VFIO. Since each device is behind its own System MMU, we
can allocate a new IOMMU group for each device.
Reviewd-by: Cho KyongHo pullip@samsung.com
6 matches
Mail list logo