Re: [PATCH v14 01/22] vfs: Add IS_ACL() and IS_RICHACL() tests

2015-11-06 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Nov 5, 2015, at 4:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > The vfs does not apply the umask for file systems that support acls. The > test used for this used to be called IS_POSIXACL(). Switch to a new > IS_ACL() test to check for either posix acls or richacls instead. Add a new > MS_RICHACL

Re: [PATCH v14 01/22] vfs: Add IS_ACL() and IS_RICHACL() tests

2015-11-06 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Nov 5, 2015, at 4:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > The vfs does not apply the umask for file systems that support acls. The > test used for this used to be called IS_POSIXACL(). Switch to a new > IS_ACL() test to check for either posix acls or richacls instead. Add a

[PATCH v14 01/22] vfs: Add IS_ACL() and IS_RICHACL() tests

2015-11-05 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
The vfs does not apply the umask for file systems that support acls. The test used for this used to be called IS_POSIXACL(). Switch to a new IS_ACL() test to check for either posix acls or richacls instead. Add a new MS_RICHACL flag and IS_RICHACL() test for richacls alone. The IS_POSIXACL() test

[PATCH v14 01/22] vfs: Add IS_ACL() and IS_RICHACL() tests

2015-11-05 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
The vfs does not apply the umask for file systems that support acls. The test used for this used to be called IS_POSIXACL(). Switch to a new IS_ACL() test to check for either posix acls or richacls instead. Add a new MS_RICHACL flag and IS_RICHACL() test for richacls alone. The IS_POSIXACL() test