Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-12-08 Thread Fu Wei
Hi Mark, On 8 December 2016 at 19:04, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:16:21AM +0800, Fu Wei wrote: >> Hi Timur, >> >> On 8 December 2016 at 01:25, Timur Tabi wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Fu Wei

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-12-08 Thread Fu Wei
Hi Mark, On 8 December 2016 at 19:04, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:16:21AM +0800, Fu Wei wrote: >> Hi Timur, >> >> On 8 December 2016 at 01:25, Timur Tabi wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Fu Wei wrote: >> >> >> >> a "+ int ret;" should be move from [12/15] to

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-12-08 Thread Mark Rutland
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:16:21AM +0800, Fu Wei wrote: > Hi Timur, > > On 8 December 2016 at 01:25, Timur Tabi wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Fu Wei wrote: > >> > >> a "+ int ret;" should be move from [12/15] to here, I have fix the > >>

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-12-08 Thread Mark Rutland
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:16:21AM +0800, Fu Wei wrote: > Hi Timur, > > On 8 December 2016 at 01:25, Timur Tabi wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Fu Wei wrote: > >> > >> a "+ int ret;" should be move from [12/15] to here, I have fix the > >> problem in my repo, it would happen in next

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-12-07 Thread Fu Wei
Hi Timur, On 8 December 2016 at 01:25, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Fu Wei wrote: >> >> a "+ int ret;" should be move from [12/15] to here, I have fix the >> problem in my repo, it would happen in next patchset >> >>

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-12-07 Thread Fu Wei
Hi Timur, On 8 December 2016 at 01:25, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Fu Wei wrote: >> >> a "+ int ret;" should be move from [12/15] to here, I have fix the >> problem in my repo, it would happen in next patchset >> >>

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-12-07 Thread Timur Tabi
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Fu Wei wrote: > > a "+ int ret;" should be move from [12/15] to here, I have fix the > problem in my repo, it would happen in next patchset > > https://git.linaro.org/people/fu.wei/linux.git/log/?h=topic-gtdt-wakeup-timer_upstream_v18_devel Fu,

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-12-07 Thread Timur Tabi
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Fu Wei wrote: > > a "+ int ret;" should be move from [12/15] to here, I have fix the > problem in my repo, it would happen in next patchset > > https://git.linaro.org/people/fu.wei/linux.git/log/?h=topic-gtdt-wakeup-timer_upstream_v18_devel Fu, please post v18 to

Re: [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-11-25 Thread Fu Wei
Hi , On 25 November 2016 at 22:32, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Fu, > > [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next] > [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc6] > [cannot apply to tip/timers/core next-20161125] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to >

Re: [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-11-25 Thread Fu Wei
Hi , On 25 November 2016 at 22:32, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Fu, > > [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next] > [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc6] > [cannot apply to tip/timers/core next-20161125] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to > help improve

Re: [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-11-25 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Fu, [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc6] [cannot apply to tip/timers/core next-20161125] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-11-25 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Fu, [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc6] [cannot apply to tip/timers/core next-20161125] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

[PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-11-25 Thread fu . wei
From: Fu Wei Because arch_timer_needs_of_probing is only for booting with device-tree, but arch_timer_common_init is a generic init call which shouldn't include the FW-specific code. It's better to put arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init function. But for per-cpu timer,

[PATCH v17 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call

2016-11-25 Thread fu . wei
From: Fu Wei Because arch_timer_needs_of_probing is only for booting with device-tree, but arch_timer_common_init is a generic init call which shouldn't include the FW-specific code. It's better to put arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init function. But for per-cpu timer, the