Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

Hi, On 29 March 2017 at 07:04, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > >> On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote: >> >>> >>> I understand your reluctance to change drivers that you cannot test. >>> An alternative it do change all the >>>

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

Hi, On 29 March 2017 at 07:04, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > >> On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote: >> >>> >>> I understand your reluctance to change drivers that you cannot test. >>> An alternative it do change all the >>>

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On Tue, Mar 07 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote: > >> >> I understand your reluctance to change drivers that you cannot test. >> An alternative it do change all the >> atomic_notifier_call_chain(.*notifier, >> calls that don't pass a pointer

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On Tue, Mar 07 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote: > >> >> I understand your reluctance to change drivers that you cannot test. >> An alternative it do change all the >> atomic_notifier_call_chain(.*notifier, >> calls that don't pass a pointer to vbus_draw to

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > Hi, > > On 14 March 2017 at 17:57, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> drivers/power/supply/wm831x_power.c | 63 +++ > >> drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig |8 + > >>

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > Hi, > > On 14 March 2017 at 17:57, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> drivers/power/supply/wm831x_power.c | 63 +++ > >> drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig |8 + > >>

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

Hi, On 14 March 2017 at 17:57, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > > [...] > >> drivers/power/supply/wm831x_power.c | 63 +++ >> drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig |8 + >> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Makefile |1 + >>

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

Hi, On 14 March 2017 at 17:57, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > > [...] > >> drivers/power/supply/wm831x_power.c | 63 +++ >> drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig |8 + >> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Makefile |1 + >> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/charger.c|

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: [...] > drivers/power/supply/wm831x_power.c | 63 +++ > drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig |8 + > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Makefile |1 + > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/charger.c| 865 > +++ >

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: [...] > drivers/power/supply/wm831x_power.c | 63 +++ > drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig |8 + > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Makefile |1 + > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/charger.c| 865 > +++ >

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

nes <lee.jo...@linaro.org>; >> Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>; John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>; >> Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>; >> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB <linux-

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

gt;> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device- >> mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with >> the usb gadget power negotation >> > ... ..

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

.@linaro.org>; > Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>; > patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>; device- > mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re:

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML > Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with > the usb gadget power negotation > ... ... > >> That is same what USB charger did, from this point, we need USB > >> charger to send out vbus draw inform

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

; >> >> Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda...@renesas.com>; Lee Jones >> >> <lee.jo...@linaro.org>; Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>; John Stultz >> >> <john.stu...@linaro.org>; Charles Keepax >> >> <ckee...@opensource.wolf

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

gt;> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device- >> mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with >> the usb gadget power negotation >> >&

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

.@linaro.org>; > Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>; > patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>; device- > mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [P

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML > Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with > the usb gadget power negotation > > On 10 March 2017 at 16:27, Jun Li wrote: > > Hi > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Baolin W

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

nes <lee.jo...@linaro.org>; >> Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>; John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>; >> Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>; >> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB <linux-

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

gt;> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device- >> mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with >> the usb gadget power negotation >> >> On 10

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

gt; Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>; > patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>; device- > mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML > Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with > the usb gadget power negotation > > On 10 March 2017 at 14:30, Jun Li wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > Will generic phy need

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On 10 March 2017 at 14:30, Jun Li wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Will generic phy need add extcon as well? >> >> >> >> Yes, will add a 'struct extcon_dev*' in 'struct usb_phy', which will >> >> be common code. >> >> >> > >> > I mean the common code need add 'struct extcon_dev' into both

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On 10 March 2017 at 14:30, Jun Li wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Will generic phy need add extcon as well? >> >> >> >> Yes, will add a 'struct extcon_dev*' in 'struct usb_phy', which will >> >> be common code. >> >> >> > >> > I mean the common code need add 'struct extcon_dev' into both 'struct >> > phy'

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

gt; Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>; > patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>; device- > mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subjec

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML > Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with > the usb gadget power negotation > > On 9 March 2017 at 18:34, Jun Li wrote: > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Baolin Wan

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

u>; grygorii.stras...@ti.com; >> >> Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda...@renesas.com>; Lee Jones >> >> <lee.jo...@linaro.org>; Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>; John Stultz >> >> <john.stu...@linaro.org>; Charles Keepax >> >> &

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

gt;> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device- >> mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with >> the usb gadget power negotation >> >> Hi, &g

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

gt; Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>; > patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>; device- > mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [P

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML > Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with > the usb gadget power negotation > > Hi, > > On 9 March 2017 at 09:50, Jun Li wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> -Original Message- > &g

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

moda...@renesas.com>; Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>; >> Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>; John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>; >> Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>; >> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB <

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

eepax ; >> patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list > p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device- >> mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with >> the usb gadget power negotation >> >>

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

.@linaro.org>; > Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>; > patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list p...@vger.kernel.org>; USB <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>; device- > mainlin...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject:

RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

n...@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML > Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with > the usb gadget power negotation > > On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > > > >> Curre

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > >> Currently the Linux kernel does not provide any standard integration of this >> feature that integrates the USB subsystem with the system power regulation >> provided by PMICs meaning that

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On 3 March 2017 at 10:23, NeilBrown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > >> Currently the Linux kernel does not provide any standard integration of this >> feature that integrates the USB subsystem with the system power regulation >> provided by PMICs meaning that either vendors

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On Mon, Feb 20 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > Currently the Linux kernel does not provide any standard integration of this > feature that integrates the USB subsystem with the system power regulation > provided by PMICs meaning that either vendors must add this in their kernels > or USB gadget

Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

On Mon, Feb 20 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > Currently the Linux kernel does not provide any standard integration of this > feature that integrates the USB subsystem with the system power regulation > provided by PMICs meaning that either vendors must add this in their kernels > or USB gadget

[PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

Currently the Linux kernel does not provide any standard integration of this feature that integrates the USB subsystem with the system power regulation provided by PMICs meaning that either vendors must add this in their kernels or USB gadget devices based on Linux (such as mobile phones) may not

[PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation

Currently the Linux kernel does not provide any standard integration of this feature that integrates the USB subsystem with the system power regulation provided by PMICs meaning that either vendors must add this in their kernels or USB gadget devices based on Linux (such as mobile phones) may not