Sorry to come late on this
On 4/25/2019 4:26 AM, Al Viro wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 07:39:03PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
This was my simple program no multithreading just to understand f_counting
int main()
{
int fd = open("/dev/uinput", O_WRONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 07:39:03PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> This was my simple program no multithreading just to understand f_counting
>
> int main()
> {
> int fd = open("/dev/uinput", O_WRONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
> ioctl(fd, UI_SET_EVBIT, EV_KEY);
> close(fd);
>
On 4/24/2019 6:37 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 05:40:40PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
Al,
i tried to put traceprintk inside ioctl after fdget and fdput on a simple
call of open => ioctl => close
in a loop, and multithreaded, presumably?
on /dev/uinput.
uinput-532
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 05:40:40PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>
> Al,
>
> i tried to put traceprintk inside ioctl after fdget and fdput on a simple
> call of open => ioctl => close
in a loop, and multithreaded, presumably?
> on /dev/uinput.
>
> uinput-532 [002] 45.312044:
On 4/23/2019 4:36 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 08:49:44AM +, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:51:13PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
I have taken care this case from ioctl and release point of view.
Even if the release gets called first it will make
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:06:12PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 08:49:44AM +, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:51:13PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>
> > > I have taken care this case from ioctl and release point of view.
> > >
> > > Even if the
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 08:49:44AM +, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:51:13PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > I have taken care this case from ioctl and release point of view.
> >
> > Even if the release gets called first it will make the
> >
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:51:13PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> On 4/23/2019 8:58 AM, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 02:13:48PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > > On 4/19/2019 12:41 PM, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:17:44PM +0530,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 02:13:48PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>
> On 4/19/2019 12:41 PM, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi Mukesh,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:17:44PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > > For some reason my last mail did not get delivered, sending it again.
> > >
> > >
On 4/19/2019 12:41 PM, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mukesh,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:17:44PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
For some reason my last mail did not get delivered, sending it again.
On 4/18/2019 11:55 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
On 4/18/2019 7:13 AM, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com
Hi Mukesh,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:17:44PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> For some reason my last mail did not get delivered, sending it again.
>
>
> On 4/18/2019 11:55 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/18/2019 7:13 AM, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Hi Mukesh,
> > >
> > > On
Hi Mukesh,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 03:35:51PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Can you please have a look at this patch ? as this seems to reproducing
> quite frequently
>
> Thanks,
> Mukesh
>
> On 4/10/2019 1:29 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > uinput_destroy_device() gets called from
Hi Dmitry,
Can you please have a look at this patch ? as this seems to reproducing
quite frequently
Thanks,
Mukesh
On 4/10/2019 1:29 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
uinput_destroy_device() gets called from two places. In one place,
uinput_ioctl_handler() where it is protected under a lock
uinput_destroy_device() gets called from two places. In one place,
uinput_ioctl_handler() where it is protected under a lock
udev->mutex but there is no protection on udev device from freeing
inside uinput_release().
This can result in Object-Already-Free case where uinput parent
device already
14 matches
Mail list logo
