On 8/13/20 3:11 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 8/13/20 8:34 AM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/13/20 12:40 PM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/13/20 11:59 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:00 PM Niklas Schnelle
wrote:
>
>
> On 8/13/20
On 8/13/20 8:34 AM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
On 8/13/20 12:40 PM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
On 8/13/20 11:59 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:00 PM Niklas Schnelle wrote:
On 8/13/20 3:55 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:21 AM Matthew Rosato
On 8/12/20 4:32 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:21:11 -0400
Matthew Rosato wrote:
s390x has the notion of providing VFs to the kernel in a manner
where the associated PF is inaccessible other than via firmware.
These are not treated as typical VFs and access to them is
On 8/13/20 12:40 PM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>
>
> On 8/13/20 11:59 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:00 PM Niklas Schnelle
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/13/20 3:55 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:21 AM Matthew Rosato
wrote:
>
On 8/13/20 11:59 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:00 PM Niklas Schnelle
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/13/20 3:55 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:21 AM Matthew Rosato
>>> wrote:
*snip*
diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:00 PM Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>
>
> On 8/13/20 3:55 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:21 AM Matthew Rosato
> > wrote:
> >> *snip*
> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> >> index 3902c9f..04ac76d 100644
> >> ---
On 8/13/20 3:55 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:21 AM Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>
>> s390x has the notion of providing VFs to the kernel in a manner
>> where the associated PF is inaccessible other than via firmware.
>> These are not treated as typical VFs and access to
On 8/13/20 3:59 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 6:33 AM Alex Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:21:11 -0400
>> Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>
... snip ...
>>
>> Is there too much implicit knowledge in defining a "detached VF"? For
>> example, why do we know
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 6:33 AM Alex Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:21:11 -0400
> Matthew Rosato wrote:
>
> > @@ -521,7 +522,8 @@ static int vfio_basic_config_read(struct
> > vfio_pci_device *vdev, int pos,
> > count = vfio_default_config_read(vdev, pos, count, perm, offset,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:21 AM Matthew Rosato wrote:
>
> s390x has the notion of providing VFs to the kernel in a manner
> where the associated PF is inaccessible other than via firmware.
> These are not treated as typical VFs and access to them is emulated
> by underlying firmware which can
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:21:11 -0400
Matthew Rosato wrote:
> s390x has the notion of providing VFs to the kernel in a manner
> where the associated PF is inaccessible other than via firmware.
> These are not treated as typical VFs and access to them is emulated
> by underlying firmware which can
s390x has the notion of providing VFs to the kernel in a manner
where the associated PF is inaccessible other than via firmware.
These are not treated as typical VFs and access to them is emulated
by underlying firmware which can still access the PF. After
abafbc55 however these detached VFs were
12 matches
Mail list logo
