On 09/05/2018 10:44 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-09-05 오전 1:24, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/04/2018 01:10 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 09/04/2018 09:59 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>> >
>> +#undef strncmp
>> +int strncmp(const char *cs, const char *ct,
On 09/05/2018 10:44 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-09-05 오전 1:24, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/04/2018 01:10 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 09/04/2018 09:59 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>> >
>> +#undef strncmp
>> +int strncmp(const char *cs, const char *ct,
On 2018-09-05 오전 1:24, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
On 09/04/2018 01:10 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>
>
> On 09/04/2018 09:59 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>
+#undef strncmp
+int strncmp(const char *cs, const char *ct, size_t len)
+{
+ check_memory_region((unsigned long)cs, len,
On 2018-09-05 오전 1:24, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
On 09/04/2018 01:10 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>
>
> On 09/04/2018 09:59 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>
+#undef strncmp
+int strncmp(const char *cs, const char *ct, size_t len)
+{
+ check_memory_region((unsigned long)cs, len,
On 09/04/2018 01:10 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>
>
> On 09/04/2018 09:59 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>
+#undef strncmp
+int strncmp(const char *cs, const char *ct, size_t len)
+{
+ check_memory_region((unsigned long)cs, len, false, _RET_IP_);
+
On 09/04/2018 01:10 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>
>
> On 09/04/2018 09:59 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>
+#undef strncmp
+int strncmp(const char *cs, const char *ct, size_t len)
+{
+ check_memory_region((unsigned long)cs, len, false, _RET_IP_);
+
On 09/04/2018 09:59 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>> > +#undef strncmp
>> > +int strncmp(const char *cs, const char *ct, size_t len)
>> > +{
>> > + check_memory_region((unsigned long)cs, len, false, _RET_IP_);
>> > + check_memory_region((unsigned long)ct, len, false, _RET_IP_);
>>
>> This will
On 09/04/2018 09:59 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>> > +#undef strncmp
>> > +int strncmp(const char *cs, const char *ct, size_t len)
>> > +{
>> > + check_memory_region((unsigned long)cs, len, false, _RET_IP_);
>> > + check_memory_region((unsigned long)ct, len, false, _RET_IP_);
>>
>> This will
Hello Andrey,
Thanks for your review.
On 2018-09-03 오후 6:40, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
On 08/23/2018 11:56 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan.c b/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> index c3bd520..61ad7f1 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> @@ -304,6 +304,29 @@ void
Hello Andrey,
Thanks for your review.
On 2018-09-03 오후 6:40, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
On 08/23/2018 11:56 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan.c b/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> index c3bd520..61ad7f1 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> @@ -304,6 +304,29 @@ void
Hello Dmitry,
On 2018-09-03 오후 6:13, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Kyeongdon Kim
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Could anyone review this and provide me appropriate approach ?
> I think str[n]cmp are frequently used functions so I believe very
useful w/
> arm64 KASAN.
Hi
Hello Dmitry,
On 2018-09-03 오후 6:13, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Kyeongdon Kim
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Could anyone review this and provide me appropriate approach ?
> I think str[n]cmp are frequently used functions so I believe very
useful w/
> arm64 KASAN.
Hi
On 08/23/2018 11:56 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan.c b/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> index c3bd520..61ad7f1 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> @@ -304,6 +304,29 @@ void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
>
> return __memcpy(dest, src,
On 08/23/2018 11:56 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan.c b/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> index c3bd520..61ad7f1 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan.c
> @@ -304,6 +304,29 @@ void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
>
> return __memcpy(dest, src,
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Could anyone review this and provide me appropriate approach ?
> I think str[n]cmp are frequently used functions so I believe very useful w/
> arm64 KASAN.
Hi Kyeongdon,
Please add tests for this to lib/test_kasan.c.
> On
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Could anyone review this and provide me appropriate approach ?
> I think str[n]cmp are frequently used functions so I believe very useful w/
> arm64 KASAN.
Hi Kyeongdon,
Please add tests for this to lib/test_kasan.c.
> On
Dear all,
Could anyone review this and provide me appropriate approach ?
I think str[n]cmp are frequently used functions so I believe very useful
w/ arm64 KASAN.
Best Regards,
Kyeongdon Kim
On 2018-08-23 오후 5:56, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
This patch declares strcmp/strncmp as weak symbols.
(2
Dear all,
Could anyone review this and provide me appropriate approach ?
I think str[n]cmp are frequently used functions so I believe very useful
w/ arm64 KASAN.
Best Regards,
Kyeongdon Kim
On 2018-08-23 오후 5:56, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
This patch declares strcmp/strncmp as weak symbols.
(2
This patch declares strcmp/strncmp as weak symbols.
(2 of them are the most used string operations)
Original functions declared as weak and
strong ones in mm/kasan/kasan.c could replace them.
Assembly optimized strcmp/strncmp functions cannot detect KASan bug.
But, now we can detect them like
This patch declares strcmp/strncmp as weak symbols.
(2 of them are the most used string operations)
Original functions declared as weak and
strong ones in mm/kasan/kasan.c could replace them.
Assembly optimized strcmp/strncmp functions cannot detect KASan bug.
But, now we can detect them like
20 matches
Mail list logo
