On Dec 18, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:14:42 +0100
"Remy Bohmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Haavard,
Please note that I'm not trying to steal the show here -- I just
want
That did not even come to my mind at all...
I am happy with everything t
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:22:01 +0800
steve birtles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any change can we clean this up?
> /*
>* We wrap our port structure around the generic uart_port.
> @@ -142,8 +146,8 @@ static void atmel_set_mctrl(struct uart_port
> *port, u_int mctrl)
> #ifdef CONFI
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:14:42 +0100
"Remy Bohmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Haavard,
>
> > Please note that I'm not trying to steal the show here -- I just want
>
> That did not even come to my mind at all...
> I am happy with everything that helps making this driver better.
Good :)
>
Hello Haavard,
> Please note that I'm not trying to steal the show here -- I just want
That did not even come to my mind at all...
I am happy with everything that helps making this driver better.
What shall we do first from here, splitup of the interrupt handler? Or
DMA patch?
Kind Regards,
R
From: Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch cleans up the atmel_serial driver to conform the coding rules.
It contains no functional change.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: additional cleanups]
Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Change
5 matches
Mail list logo