On 09/11/14 09:34, Chris Mason wrote:
On 09/05/2014 06:58 PM, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Vinícius Tinti
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
struct {
struct shash_desc shash;
On 09/05/2014 06:58 PM, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
> From: Vinícius Tinti
>
> Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
> compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
>
> struct {
> struct shash_desc shash;
> char
On 09/11/14 09:34, Chris Mason wrote:
On 09/05/2014 06:58 PM, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Vinícius Tinti viniciusti...@gmail.com
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
struct {
On 09/05/2014 06:58 PM, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Vinícius Tinti viniciusti...@gmail.com
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
struct {
struct shash_desc shash;
char
From: Vinícius Tinti
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
struct {
struct shash_desc shash;
char ctx[crypto_shash_descsize(tfm)];
} desc;
This patch instead allocates the appropriate
From: Vinícius Tinti viniciusti...@gmail.com
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
struct {
struct shash_desc shash;
char ctx[crypto_shash_descsize(tfm)];
} desc;
This patch instead
6 matches
Mail list logo
