On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:02:49AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Greg KH wrote:
> > What changed from v1? Please always include it below the --- line to
> > keep maintainer's semi-sane.
>
> If anything changed I would have -- this is only the From != SoB thing
> you were
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:02:49AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Greg KH wrote:
> > What changed from v1? Please always include it below the --- line to
> > keep maintainer's semi-sane.
>
> If anything changed I would have -- this is only the From != SoB thing
> you were
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Greg KH wrote:
What changed from v1? Please always include it below the --- line to
keep maintainer's semi-sane.
If anything changed I would have -- this is only the From != SoB thing
you were complaining about. There's nothing to try again, this is a trivial.
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Greg KH wrote:
What changed from v1? Please always include it below the --- line to
keep maintainer's semi-sane.
If anything changed I would have -- this is only the From != SoB thing
you were complaining about. There's nothing to try again, this is a trivial.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:49:26AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> With the new standardized functions, we can replace all ACCESS_ONCE()
> calls across relevant drivers/base/.
>
> ACCESS_ONCE() does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For example
> gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:49:26AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> With the new standardized functions, we can replace all ACCESS_ONCE()
> calls across relevant drivers/base/.
>
> ACCESS_ONCE() does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For example
> gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag
With the new standardized functions, we can replace all ACCESS_ONCE()
calls across relevant drivers/base/.
ACCESS_ONCE() does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For example
gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such accesses during
the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step:
With the new standardized functions, we can replace all ACCESS_ONCE()
calls across relevant drivers/base/.
ACCESS_ONCE() does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For example
gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such accesses during
the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step:
8 matches
Mail list logo
