Re: [PATCH v2] drm/exynos/dsi: Remove error handling for bridge_node DT parsing

2017-06-19 Thread Hoegeun Kwon
Hello Tobias, Sorry for late reply. On 06/14/2017 09:30 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote: Hello Hoegeun, my last question (does this regress the case "node required, but absent") still stands. Hoegeun Kwon wrote: Remove the error handling of bridge_node because the bridge_node is required optionally

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/exynos/dsi: Remove error handling for bridge_node DT parsing

2017-06-14 Thread Tobias Jakobi
Hello Hoegeun, my last question (does this regress the case "node required, but absent") still stands. Hoegeun Kwon wrote: > Remove the error handling of bridge_node because the bridge_node is > required optionally. I don't think a construction like that exists. Either it's required, or it's opt

[PATCH v2] drm/exynos/dsi: Remove error handling for bridge_node DT parsing

2017-06-13 Thread Hoegeun Kwon
Remove the error handling of bridge_node because the bridge_node is required optionally. For example, In case of Exynos SoC, a bridge device such as mDNIe and MIC could be placed between Display Controller and MIPI DSI device but the bridge device is required optionally. Signed-off-by: Hoegeun Kw