On 03/23/2014 09:03 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 07:12:05PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 03/23/2014 11:19 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:37:52 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
Required properties;
- - compatible: must be
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 07:12:05PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 03/23/2014 11:19 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:37:52 +0100
>> Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
Required properties;
- - compatible: must be "nxp,tda998x"
+ - compatible: may be
On 03/23/2014 11:19 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:37:52 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
Required properties;
- - compatible: must be "nxp,tda998x"
+ - compatible: may be "nxp,tda9989", "nxp,tda19988" or "nxp,tda19989"
There is a "DT is ABI" policy and although
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:37:52 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > Required properties;
> > - - compatible: must be "nxp,tda998x"
> > + - compatible: may be "nxp,tda9989", "nxp,tda19988" or "nxp,tda19989"
>
> There is a "DT is ABI" policy and although there is no mainline Linux
> user of
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:37:52 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com wrote:
Required properties;
- - compatible: must be nxp,tda998x
+ - compatible: may be nxp,tda9989, nxp,tda19988 or nxp,tda19989
There is a DT is ABI policy and although there is no mainline
On 03/23/2014 11:19 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:37:52 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com wrote:
Required properties;
- - compatible: must be nxp,tda998x
+ - compatible: may be nxp,tda9989, nxp,tda19988 or nxp,tda19989
There is a DT is
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 07:12:05PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 03/23/2014 11:19 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:37:52 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com wrote:
Required properties;
- - compatible: must be nxp,tda998x
+ -
On 03/23/2014 09:03 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 07:12:05PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 03/23/2014 11:19 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:37:52 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com wrote:
Required
On 03/21/2014 11:55 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
The tda998x driver accepts only 3 chips from the TDA998x family.
This patch changes the driver compatible strings to these chips.
Jean-Francois,
be careful with building a DT binding from a Linux driver. Although
we constantly struggle to
The tda998x driver accepts only 3 chips from the TDA998x family.
This patch changes the driver compatible strings to these chips.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine
---
v2: change the subject to drm/i2c
This patch applies after
drm/i2c: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in DT
The tda998x driver accepts only 3 chips from the TDA998x family.
This patch changes the driver compatible strings to these chips.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine moin...@free.fr
---
v2: change the subject to drm/i2c
This patch applies after
drm/i2c: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in
On 03/21/2014 11:55 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
The tda998x driver accepts only 3 chips from the TDA998x family.
This patch changes the driver compatible strings to these chips.
Jean-Francois,
be careful with building a DT binding from a Linux driver. Although
we constantly struggle to
12 matches
Mail list logo
