el@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: Modify tx/rx configurations
> to avoid null pointer dereferences in e1000_open
>
> When e1000e_setup_rx_resources is failed in e1000_open,
> e1000e_free_tx_resources in "err_setup_rx" segment is execu
: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: Modify tx/rx configurations
to avoid null pointer dereferences in e1000_open
When e1000e_setup_rx_resources is failed in e1000_open,
e1000e_free_tx_resources in err_setup_rx segment is executed.
writel(0, tx_ring-head) statement in e1000_clean_tx_ring
On 08/05/2015 06:43 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
Is your intention that this patch replace the existing patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/502990/
...which is currently in my queue?
Okay, please replace the previous patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 18:16 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> When e1000e_setup_rx_resources is failed in e1000_open,
> e1000e_free_tx_resources in "err_setup_rx" segment is executed.
> "writel(0, tx_ring->head)" statement in e1000_clean_tx_ring
> in e1000e_free_tx_resources will cause a null poonter
>
When e1000e_setup_rx_resources is failed in e1000_open,
e1000e_free_tx_resources in "err_setup_rx" segment is executed.
"writel(0, tx_ring->head)" statement in e1000_clean_tx_ring
in e1000e_free_tx_resources will cause a null poonter dereference(crash),
because "tx_ring->head" is only assigned in
When e1000e_setup_rx_resources is failed in e1000_open,
e1000e_free_tx_resources in err_setup_rx segment is executed.
writel(0, tx_ring-head) statement in e1000_clean_tx_ring
in e1000e_free_tx_resources will cause a null poonter dereference(crash),
because tx_ring-head is only assigned in
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 18:16 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
When e1000e_setup_rx_resources is failed in e1000_open,
e1000e_free_tx_resources in err_setup_rx segment is executed.
writel(0, tx_ring-head) statement in e1000_clean_tx_ring
in e1000e_free_tx_resources will cause a null poonter
On 08/05/2015 06:43 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
Is your intention that this patch replace the existing patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/502990/
...which is currently in my queue?
Okay, please replace the previous patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
8 matches
Mail list logo