Hi Yunlong,
I think you have changed original implication of the function, IMO, it would be
more accurate to use user_free_segment_blocks instead of free_user_blocks.
Thanks,
On 2017/8/18 18:02, Yunlong Song wrote:
> ping...
>
> On 2017/8/15 15:14, Yunlong Song wrote:
>> The part
Hi Yunlong,
I think you have changed original implication of the function, IMO, it would be
more accurate to use user_free_segment_blocks instead of free_user_blocks.
Thanks,
On 2017/8/18 18:02, Yunlong Song wrote:
> ping...
>
> On 2017/8/15 15:14, Yunlong Song wrote:
>> The part
ping...
On 2017/8/15 15:14, Yunlong Song wrote:
The part (overprovision_segments - reserved_segments) can still be used for LFS
in some case, e.g., there are lots of invalid block from dirty segments, then
the part (overprovision_segments - reserved_segments) can be safely used. So
ping...
On 2017/8/15 15:14, Yunlong Song wrote:
The part (overprovision_segments - reserved_segments) can still be used for LFS
in some case, e.g., there are lots of invalid block from dirty segments, then
the part (overprovision_segments - reserved_segments) can be safely used. So
The part (overprovision_segments - reserved_segments) can still be used for LFS
in some case, e.g., there are lots of invalid block from dirty segments, then
the part (overprovision_segments - reserved_segments) can be safely used. So
free_use_blocks should use reserved_segments instead, rather
The part (overprovision_segments - reserved_segments) can still be used for LFS
in some case, e.g., there are lots of invalid block from dirty segments, then
the part (overprovision_segments - reserved_segments) can be safely used. So
free_use_blocks should use reserved_segments instead, rather
6 matches
Mail list logo