Hi Chao,
At 2016-09-27 17:46:30, "Chao Yu" wrote:
>On 2016/9/27 10:05, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>> There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
>> and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
>> get_checkpoint_version to clean up redundant
Hi Chao,
At 2016-09-27 17:46:30, "Chao Yu" wrote:
>On 2016/9/27 10:05, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>> There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
>> and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
>> get_checkpoint_version to clean up redundant codes.
>>
>>
On 2016/9/27 10:05, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
> and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
> get_checkpoint_version to clean up redundant codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang
> ---
>
On 2016/9/27 10:05, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
> and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
> get_checkpoint_version to clean up redundant codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 63
>
There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
get_checkpoint_version to clean up redundant codes.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 63
There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
get_checkpoint_version to clean up redundant codes.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 63 ++--
1
6 matches
Mail list logo