On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2013 at 13:51:12, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Have you considered this [pinctrl] approach?
>
> No, I haven't. And although this doesn't solve all my problems, I like the
> idea very much! Thank you for this! But at the
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Lars Poeschel poesc...@lemonage.de wrote:
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 at 13:51:12, Linus Walleij wrote:
Have you considered this [pinctrl] approach?
No, I haven't. And although this doesn't solve all my problems, I like the
idea very much! Thank you for
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 at 13:51:12, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Lars Poeschel
wrote:
> > On Monday 11 February 2013 at 22:25:51, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> However, is the pullup selection per-gpio line? If so, then why not
> >> encode it into the flags field of
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 at 13:51:12, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Lars Poeschel poesc...@lemonage.de
wrote:
On Monday 11 February 2013 at 22:25:51, Grant Likely wrote:
However, is the pullup selection per-gpio line? If so, then why not
encode it into the
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2013 at 22:25:51, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>> However, is the pullup selection per-gpio line? If so, then why not
>> encode it into the flags field of the gpio specifier?
>
> Yes, the pullup is per-gpio line. I am
On Monday 11 February 2013 at 22:25:51, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:52:42 +0100, Lars Poeschel
wrote:
> > +Optional device specific properties:
> > +- mcp,chips : This is a table with 2 columns and up to 8 entries. The
> > first column + is a is_present flag, that makes
On Monday 11 February 2013 at 22:25:51, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:52:42 +0100, Lars Poeschel la...@wh2.tu-dresden.de
wrote:
+Optional device specific properties:
+- mcp,chips : This is a table with 2 columns and up to 8 entries. The
first column + is a is_present
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Lars Poeschel poesc...@lemonage.de wrote:
On Monday 11 February 2013 at 22:25:51, Grant Likely wrote:
However, is the pullup selection per-gpio line? If so, then why not
encode it into the flags field of the gpio specifier?
Yes, the pullup is per-gpio line.
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:52:42 +0100, Lars Poeschel
wrote:
> From: Lars Poeschel
>
> This converts the mcp23s08 driver to be able to be used with device
> tree.
> Explicitly allow -1 as a legal value for the
> mcp23s08_platform_data->base. This is the special value lets the
> kernel choose a
From: Lars Poeschel
This converts the mcp23s08 driver to be able to be used with device
tree.
Explicitly allow -1 as a legal value for the
mcp23s08_platform_data->base. This is the special value lets the
kernel choose a valid global gpio base number.
There is a "mcp,chips" device tree property,
From: Lars Poeschel poesc...@lemonage.de
This converts the mcp23s08 driver to be able to be used with device
tree.
Explicitly allow -1 as a legal value for the
mcp23s08_platform_data-base. This is the special value lets the
kernel choose a valid global gpio base number.
There is a mcp,chips
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:52:42 +0100, Lars Poeschel la...@wh2.tu-dresden.de
wrote:
From: Lars Poeschel poesc...@lemonage.de
This converts the mcp23s08 driver to be able to be used with device
tree.
Explicitly allow -1 as a legal value for the
mcp23s08_platform_data-base. This is the special
12 matches
Mail list logo
