On 10/17/2016 11:59 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> If user sets panic_on_warn, he wants kernel to panic if there is
> anything barely wrong with the kernel. KASAN-detected errors
> are definitely not less benign than an arbitrary kernel WARNING.
>
> Panic after KASAN errors if panic_on_warn is set.
>
On 10/17/2016 11:59 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> If user sets panic_on_warn, he wants kernel to panic if there is
> anything barely wrong with the kernel. KASAN-detected errors
> are definitely not less benign than an arbitrary kernel WARNING.
>
> Panic after KASAN errors if panic_on_warn is set.
>
If user sets panic_on_warn, he wants kernel to panic if there is
anything barely wrong with the kernel. KASAN-detected errors
are definitely not less benign than an arbitrary kernel WARNING.
Panic after KASAN errors if panic_on_warn is set.
We use this for continuous fuzzing where we want kernel
If user sets panic_on_warn, he wants kernel to panic if there is
anything barely wrong with the kernel. KASAN-detected errors
are definitely not less benign than an arbitrary kernel WARNING.
Panic after KASAN errors if panic_on_warn is set.
We use this for continuous fuzzing where we want kernel
4 matches
Mail list logo