On Fri, 8 Feb 2019, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Hi Miroslav,
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:24:21AM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > Hi Kamalesh,
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Feb 2019, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:28:32AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > On Tue 2019-02-05 09
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:34:45AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2019-02-08 11:50:05, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:28:32AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Tue 2019-02-05 09:59:33, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:33:28AM +0900, Alice Ferrazz
Hi Miroslav,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:24:21AM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> Hi Kamalesh,
>
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2019, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:28:32AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Tue 2019-02-05 09:59:33, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 0
On Fri 2019-02-08 11:50:05, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:28:32AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Tue 2019-02-05 09:59:33, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:33:28AM +0900, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> > > > From: Alice Ferrazzi
> > > >
> > > > As a result o
Hi Kamalesh,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:28:32AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Tue 2019-02-05 09:59:33, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:33:28AM +0900, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> > > > From: Alice Ferrazzi
> > > >
> > > > As a r
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:28:32AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2019-02-05 09:59:33, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:33:28AM +0900, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> > > From: Alice Ferrazzi
> > >
> > > As a result of an unsupported operation is better to use EOPNOTSUPP
> > > as
On Tue 2019-02-05 09:59:33, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:33:28AM +0900, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> > From: Alice Ferrazzi
> >
> > As a result of an unsupported operation is better to use EOPNOTSUPP
> > as error code.
> > ENOSYS is only used for 'invalid syscall nr' and nothing
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:33:28AM +0900, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> From: Alice Ferrazzi
>
> As a result of an unsupported operation is better to use EOPNOTSUPP
> as error code.
> ENOSYS is only used for 'invalid syscall nr' and nothing else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ferrazzi
Acked-by: Josh Poim
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> From: Alice Ferrazzi
>
> As a result of an unsupported operation is better to use EOPNOTSUPP
> as error code.
> ENOSYS is only used for 'invalid syscall nr' and nothing else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ferrazzi
Acked-by: Miroslav Benes
Miroslav
On Tue 2019-02-05 03:33:28, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> From: Alice Ferrazzi
>
> As a result of an unsupported operation is better to use EOPNOTSUPP
> as error code.
> ENOSYS is only used for 'invalid syscall nr' and nothing else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ferrazzi
Acked-by: Petr Mladek
Best Rega
From: Alice Ferrazzi
As a result of an unsupported operation is better to use EOPNOTSUPP
as error code.
ENOSYS is only used for 'invalid syscall nr' and nothing else.
Signed-off-by: Alice Ferrazzi
---
Changes v1->v2:
- Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP (Petr)
kernel/livepatch/core.c | 2 +-
11 matches
Mail list logo